E-mail address is: wtpfit@gmail.com
We The People Constitutional Class
The name was changed March 2005 to: We The People for Independent Texas
We The People for Independent Texas Websites:
http://wtpfit.freeservers.com Start October 2005 Current Website
http://wtpcc.freeservers.com 2005 to October 2005
http://wtplc.freeservers.com Years 2001 thru 2004
http://micromann.freeservers.com Original Website
http://trcp.freeservers.com Texas Rules of Civil Procedure TRCP
http://www.freewebs.com/wtpfit/ Clerks Duties
Get a copy of the Video: Copyright - Its All in the NAME.
A sample copyright instrument suitable for recordation will be included.
A CD is now also available for a donation containing documents actually used.
CD contains:
Documents actually used.
MP3 Audio of Classes
MP3 Audio of Copyright Class
Texas Rules of Civil Procedure
All past classes are available by special request only!
The reason we do not set a price is because if we did it would be a price and not a donation. Some can afford more and others can afford nothing. It is not for us to make that decision. We send the information out and if you want to donate, we say thank you but many cannot afford it and are deprived of lawful information. Most donate at least enough to cover postage and materials and others donate to cover the ones that are not as fortunate.
Note: All additions to Website is in order by date.
** Newest information is always at the bottom! **
[Did you know #1 and #2 - Poster/Flyer - Posted December 12, 2004]
Poster/Flyer - [Did you know #1]
To all of Texas: every man, woman and child
Did you know that the Texas Constitution mandates by law that there is to be a county Court of record in each county of Texas?
Did you know that the county Court of record is your (the people’s) Court?
Did you know the county Court has been closed and the people are denied remedy by law in a Court of competent jurisdiction?
Did you know that the elected county Judge has the sworn duty to convene that county Court?
Did you know that the county Commissioners has the sworn duty to set the time and term of that county Court?
Did you know that the county Clerk has the sworn duty to call the Jurors by notice and publish the docket of that county Court?
Did you know that you have a sworn duty as Texans to uphold the Texas Constitution and the laws of Texas?
This call goes out to all the people that claim to be Texans. Come unite with us who are pledged to restoring law and order in Texas.
Will you come unite with us and do your sworn duty to uphold the laws of Texas?
Ralph-Kenneth: Evans
Learn the Texas Constitution. Know the Bill of Rights
Free classes: 1st, 3rd and 5th Thursday.
For class information or Video contact wtpcc@lycos.com
Poster/Flyer - [Did you know #2]
Notice
Did you know THE STATE OF TEXAS is not registered with the Secretary of State to do business in the State of Texas?
Did you know all the agents for THE STATE OF TEXAS are doing business without a license to do business in Texas?
Did you know they are all Tax Evaders?
Did you know the Bar Association is not registered to do Business and are operating in commerce without a license and are tax evaders?
Did you know the legislators and the Governor have vacated their office for failure to uphold their sworn oath of office?
Did you know the agents of the Bar Association are all operating outside the laws of Texas in Commerce without a license making themselves outlaws in modern terms Criminals?
Did you know the agents for THE STATE OF TEXAS are a criminal racketeering cartel operating on the soil of Texas in the counties in Texas and extorting from the people their life liberty and property under the color of Code?
Did you know the agents of the Bar association are the Ring Leaders of this Criminal Racketeering Cartel that is extorting from the people in the several counties their life liberty and property for their own self enrichment?
Did you know the agents of the Bar association have infiltrated all three departments of the Government of the State of Texas and are impersonating judicial officers of the State of Texas?
Did you know the agents of the Bar association have infiltrated all three departments of the Government of the State of Texas and are aided and abetted by the employees, agents and officials in the Executive, Legislative and Judicial branch for their own self enrichment?
Did you know the agents of the Bar association have used their Bar Card to suspend the Texas "Bill of Rights" Article 1 of the Constitution for Texas?
Did you know the agents of the Bar association have made themselves your rulers and use your officials Executive, Legislative and Judicial to pass the required Statutory Codes for enforcement of their rule over you?
Did you know the agents of the Bar association have closed your Courts and the only Courts left open to you is their Courts, which they use to force you into compliance under their rule?
Did you know the agents of the Bar association have each paid a bribe to the Bar association of the State of Texas for the authority of their judicial office?
Did you know the agents of the Bar association when they paid that bribe, violated their oath of office that all officers of the State are required to take Quote: "I, __________, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I have not directly or indirectly paid, offered, or promised to pay, contributed, or promised to contribute any money, or valuable thing, or promised any public office or employment, as a reward to secure my appointment or confirmation thereof, so help me God.”?
Did you know any act done by any agent of the Bar association against anyone of We the People in any Judicial preceding in the State was done in violation of the laws of the State and the Constitution for the State?
Did you know the agents of the Bar association are individually responsible for any act or damage done to you in any judicial proceeding in the State?
Did you know the Governor, the Lt. Governor the Legislators, the Secretary of State and the Supreme Court has been given notice of the crimes by these agents and have failed to act or take any corrective action what-so-ever to stop the damage upon We the People by these agents?
Did you know the agents of the Bar association have been given special rights to the law in Texas and have formed a monopoly and one of them must represent you in any criminal trial in the State courts and in civil trial if you are not represented by one of them, the Bar card agent on the bench will rule against you?
Did you know the agents of the Bar association have conspired with the elected officials in the counties of Texas and have closed the Article III one supreme court of the We the People in the counties of Texas in violation of the laws and the Constitution for the State of Texas as mandate by Article 5 Sections 15, 17 and 27?
Did you know the agents of the Bar association have the only Courts open in the State of Texas in violation of both the Constitutions for the State of Texas and the 1787-1791 Constitution for the United States in America?
Did you know the State of Texas District Court’s Grand Jury only have authority for indictments below the grade of felony? See Article 5 Section 13 of the Constitution for the State of Texas.
Did you know the State of Texas District Court’s Grand Jury must certify all grand Jury indictments returned in the District Courts (both civil and criminal) to the Article III county Court of Record (which has been closed)? See Article 5 Section 17 of the Constitution for the State of Texas.
Ralph-Kenneth: Evans
Learn the Texas Constitution. Know the Bill of Rights
Free classes: 1st, 3rd and 5th Thursday.
For class information or Video contact wtpcc@lycos.com
[Senators Notice Of No Response - Posted December 14, 2004]
From: Ralph-Kenneth, family of Evans
Mailing Location exact:
Notary Public
3352 Broadway Boulevard # 406
Garland, Texas
To: Senator Bob Deuell
18601 LBJ Freeway, Suite 400
Mesquite, Texas
NOTICE OF FAILURE TO RESPONSE FOR my Demand for CONGRESSIONAL injunctive relief and notice of criminal racketeering and sedition by members of the commercial association known as the TEXAS BAR ASSOCIATION operating in collusion with STATE, COUNTIES, and CITIES, all commercial trust entities, in violation of the laws of Texas and the Texas Constitution.
Senator Deuell: I gave you notice and demand for congressional injunctive relief and notice of criminal racketeering and sedition by commercial entities created by misnomer, willful idem sonans, deceptive trade practices, lack of full disclosure, in want of jurisdiction, for and in the name of which the Texas Legislators create legislation, and for which is approved by the Governor in violation of the rules and laws of Texas and the Constitution for Texas, and approved by action of law by the acquiescence of the un-informed people who have faithfully placed in your hands their trust that their elected officials would not betray them and fall into a condition of sedition. You HAVE FAILED TO RESPONSE OR TAKE ANY ACTION TO RIGHT THE WRONG DONE TO ME OR MAKE AVAILABLE TO ME LAWFUL DUE PROCESS IN A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION.
I as well as others in Texas have suffered regularly and on going thief of land, funds (Federal Reserve Notes, mortgage Notes and gold Coins) and liberty, inflicted upon us by the statutorily created commercial trust entities using copyrighted law and commercial chambers impersonating lawful courts in which we the people can not appear for want of license. YOU HAVE IGNORED MY AND THE PEOPLE'S RIGHT TO JUSTICE AND THE RIGHT OF REDRESS.
I have been denied due process, a republican form of government, redress and remedy by due course of law, all because the chief judge of the highest commercial Court in this THE STATE OF TEXAS has without delegation of authority issued an unlawful opinion that the lawful Article 5, Section 15 county court of record in collusion with the county judge, the county clerk, the county commissioners, the county sheriff and the STATE'S DISTRICT ATTORNEY did close and not accept any cases concerning the people and matters of law in violation of the laws of Texas and the Texas Constitution.
Most recently, BAR CARD commercial trust agents (BAR CARD YOLLICK, EDWARDS and BAR CARD RECEIVER FOR THE BAR CARD HOLDER'S OWN SELF ENRICHMENT) did used a parole violator and a tax violator Jacques Jaikaran for falsely fabricating commercial cases and used it for taking ,000.00 with the aid of MESQUITE'S BANK BAR CARD ATTORNEY and BAR CARD ATTORNEY EUGENE DUBOSE taking of my land located within the limits of Mesquite, Texas by using the improperly enacted STATE and COUNTY statutorily created commercial Courts. All of the actors participating in concert for the scheme and artifice for defrauding me out of my assets are all BAR CARD commercial welfare trust agents and members of this STATE OF TEXAS created perpetual monopoly known as the TEXAS BAR ASSOCIATION, and the Medical association and said BAR ASSOCIATION is uncontrolled and unregulated by any oversight agency answerable to the people.
This said BAR CARD association and the commercial Courts operated by their members excludes me and the people from remedy by requiring the licensing of anyone practicing inside the commercial chamber, and are using private copyrighted law for violating the laws of Texas and the Texas Constitution..
Senator Deuell you and your fellow Legislators have all taken the Article 16, Section 1 Official Oath to uphold the Constitutions for both, the State of Texas and the United States of America. If you have not then you all are without office. The county commissioners, county judge, sheriff, and county clerk have also taken the same oath.
I brought to your attention by petition my grievances and a few of the laws you and your fellow legislators are required for upholding as a responsibility for taking the oath contracting with the people for specific performance and ascending to office. YOU DID NOT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE IN ANY FORM MY PETITION
You all are required to provide me and all fellow Texans the following:
Preservation of a republican form of government as mandated by the Texas Constitution Article 1, Section 2. I want to remind you that a republican form of government is not a subsidiary commercial welfare trust enterprise known alternatively as this STATE, or this State or THE STATE OF TEXAS, which are all names of a subsidiary welfare trust enterprise of a national socialist democracy cestui que welfare trust enterprise headquartered in Washington, known as the UNITED STATES or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA which said trusts exist by action simply because the people have not been given full disclosure of how the government and judiciary were taken over, and the people do not know how to restore their lawful government WITHOUT THE AID OF THEIR ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO HAVE THE DUTY AND WHO HAVE SWORN AN OATH TO DO SO.
Preservation of the right of local self-government, unimpaired. (that means county government by Law, and not a STATE administrative welfare trust by statute).
Equality under law is mandatory. That means that the BAR ASSOCIATION is answerable to the people, and the people must have a court for remedy that is not operated by BAR CARD commercial agents. The practice here in Dallas of the civil District Attorney, a commercial agent of the commercial side of our State of Texas, and a BAR member, telling the County Clerk what she can and cannot file must be ended immediately. By what delegation of authority do commercial agents have the authority to interfere with the government of the people and dictate to a man in full capacity what he can and cannot place in the record for the public, or dictate to the recorder of the county what she can and cannot record for the record of the public? You must address this issue at once. This issue goes hand into glove with the county Clerk being the docket clerk for the county Court of record. By what authority do BAR CARD commercial agents dictate to the county clerk the scope and requirements and authority of her OR HIS office?
The jury of peers shall have the right to determine the law and the facts in all cases. That means that the county Court of record must be reopen and the clerk must advertise for a jury pool of competent people who have read and understand the Constitution and who are competent for law remedy, and who are not members of the democratic welfare trust and which said members of the democratic welfare trust are not competent to reach a law remedy or sit in judgment of a case concerning law and a non-member of the welfare trust. See Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288 (1936), and Great Falls Mfg. Co. v. Attorney General, 124 U. S. 581.
No action can begin in any court without probable cause, meaning a declaration from a victim supported by oath or affirmation. A BAR CARD commercial agent or one of the commercial agent minions in uniform writing up a complaint is not a declaration from a victim. We the people are not commercial person actors and violators. We are people and we are entitled to all of the protections expressed in Article 1 of the Texas Constitution, especially Article 1, Section 10.
I gave you notice you and your fellow Legislators to read Article 1 Section 10 of the Texas Constitution, which said Constitution you have taken an oath to uphold. Section 10 is being violated by every BAR CARD commercial agent prosecutor and every BAR CARD commercial chamber judge for every case against one of the people who is a non-member of the democratic welfare trust that is brought into these commercial Courts, which said commercial Courts have been unlawfully enacted in the name of this THE STATE OF TEXAS allegedly with the authority of the State of Texas. By what authority does the legislature of the lawful State of Texas enact legislation in the name of this State, THE STATE OF TEXAS?
The writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right, and shall never be suspended. Article 3, Section 62 is very emphatic in the expression of the fact that no matter if the elected officers of the State of Texas decided to suspend the constitution and the lawful government and run under an emergency corporation government, the rights of the people remaining non-members of the democratic trust would be protected. This protection of the rights of the people tracks the protection contained in the footnote of the United States Code Title 5, Section 559 footnotes indicating that the writers of our Texas Constitution were far advanced in their determination for protecting the rights of the people in times of greed, deception, and emergency rule advocated by BAR CARD commercial agents. A statutory commercial writ of Habeas Corpus submitted to the Court of Criminal Appeals, which is one of the commercial chambers is not a Writ of Right as required by the Texas Constitution. A Writ of Habeas Corpus that invokes the Law that is denied by the Court of Criminal Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court with a terse statement about lack of jurisdiction is not guaranteeing remedy for those of us who are non-members of and foreign (strangers) to the democratic welfare trust operated in this STATE.
As mandated by the Texas Constitution Article 1, Section 13, all courts shall be open. (One of those said courts is the Law side of the article 5 Section 15 constitutional county Court of record. The Lawful constitutional county Court of record of the people cannot be closed by an opinion of the chief judge of the SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, which SUPREME COURT is a commercial chamber of the democratic welfare trust scheme.) For every injury done him, in his lands, goods, person or reputation, it is mandated by the Texas Constitution that every man shall have remedy by due course of law. No where in law or statute of the state of Texas is it published that the people who are non-members of the democratic welfare trust must contract with commercial agents of this THE STATE OF TEXAS and use copyrighted statute and rules belonging to West publishing company, which is a subsidiary corporation of the Thompson group, which is incorporated in the City of London, England. I and many others are without remedy by law. We are respecters of copyright law and we know who we are and our law venue. By what delegation of authority did the chief judge of the BAR CARD operated commercial chamber known as THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS issue an opinion closing the county Court of record of the Article 5, Section 15 county Courts? You must address this question. You must provide for me the answer about where and how the said BAR CARD commercial agent chief judge got the delegation of authority for closing the constitutional county Court of record of the people.
The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate. The Texas Constitution at Article 1, Section 19 is explicit and requires that a trial by jury of peers by law of the land be offered to those of us who know what is that venue. Specifically, a jury trial wherein an advisory jury panel of legally disabled democratic welfare trust members, (see above Ashwander and Great Falls), who are impersonating a lawful jury, who have not studied the law, and who have about as much brainpower as a herd of cows, and who are specifically culled during the jury selection process for their stupidity and eagerness for accepting fiction in place of fact, by the BAR CARD district attorneys, again, they are commercial agents of the democratic welfare trust known as this STATE, is not a trial by jury as mandated by Article 1, Section 19. You must restore the remedy for the people who are not subject to benefits.
No citizen of Texas shall be deprived of life, liberty, property, privileges or immunities, or in any manner disfranchised, except by the due of the law of the land. Specifically, for those of us who are not members of the democratic welfare trust, we cannot be forced to use copyrighted statute in commercial chambers of this STATE operated exclusively by BAR CARD commercial agents. By what authority must I be forced to contract with a BAR CARD attorney operating commercial chamber which is inferior to my constitutionally protected court and remedy?
Article 1, Section 29, was specifically placed into the constitution for protecting the rights of the people who are not members of the democratic welfare trust of this STATE. The Section 29 expresses in part: "To guard against transgressions of the high powers herein (notice it does not say higher powers) delegated, (notice it says delegated) we declare everything in this 'Bill of Rights' is excepted out of the general powers of government, (that means acts of the legislature, meaning statute and commercial chamber judges are not superior to the people), and shall forever remain inviolate, and all laws contrary thereto, or to the following provisions, shall be void." Specifically there is no authority by law for the closing of the constitutional county Court of record. The Article 5, Section 15 county Court of record must be immediately reopened for business. The commissioners are to set the time and term for the court and the clerk is to docket the causes and the judge is to seat the Court from a pool of men carefully chosen unlike the choosing of advisory jury panels for their stupidity and ability to accept fiction in place of fact. You must address this issue at once. In actuality, the State of Texas does not exist without there being a court for remedy for the people who are not members of the commercial welfare trust. There being no lawful government here in Texas, then remedy may lay in another law venue external to Texas for enforcement of the formation documents of Texas. INTERNATIONAL LAW REQUIRES ALL OFFICIALS OF A NATION FOLLOW AND HERETO THAT NATION'S CONSTITUTION.
Article 3, Section 62 specifically expresses that all of Article I of the Constitution of Texas known as the "Bill of Rights" "shall not be in any manner affected, amended, impaired, suspended, repealed or suspended hereby" by the legislators should the legislators ever decide to suspend the constitution or operate the State of Texas as a commercial welfare trust enterprise known as this STATE and/or THE STATE OF TEXAS, or to unlawfully enact legislation for this THE STATE OF TEXAS and make claims on the title pages of the legislation that such legislation of this STATE is enacted by the authority of the State of Texas, which is absolute nonsense, unlawful, without delegation of authority, and is sedition. How many of these acts have you given your approval? Check the law. An unrecorded voice vote does not suspend the rules. A 4/5ths record vote is required for suspending the rules and the constitution.
Senator Deuell, you have taken an oath to uphold the laws of the state of Texas and the Texas Constitution. I accept your Official Oath as your contract with me and the people and I expect you and your fellow legislators to uphold the laws of Texas and the Texas Constitution. The Article 5, Section 15, county Court of record has been closed without delegation of authority by an unlawful opinion of a BAR CARD commercial chamber agents operating for the unjust self enrichment of the commercial agents of this STATE. There being no authority for the issuing of the said opinion, the causing of the ignorant county Court judges to close the law side of our courts is a crime of sedition.
The county commissioners here in the county of Dallas refuse to fix the time and term of the county Court of record. The clerk has refused to docket the petitions for redress. And the county Judge, Ms. Margaret Kelleher, who is legally disabled from holding the position of county Judge because she is a BAR CARD commercial agent from the commercial venue, has refused to seat the Court and open the Court for business probably with the understanding that she not competent for holding a session of a law venue Court.
The unlawfully enacted statutory courts operating under the banner of this THE STATE OF TEXAS, which said banner is prohibited by the Texas Constitution Article 5, Section 12, and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 15, 99, 114, 176, the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 1.23 and over 40 other cites of rules of prohibition for running writs and process in the name of this THE STATE OF TEXAS are in want of jurisdiction of me and my private property and matters affecting me, and the same lack of jurisdiction applies to other sovereigns in full capacity similarly situated as myself.
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS has concurred to this fact by dismissing all of my petitions for redress for want of jurisdiction except a writ of habeas corpus. I am without a Court for redress by law and due process by law. You and your fellow legislators are required to ensure that the remedy protected to me by the Texas Constitution is available to me. As a member nation in the united States of America, the legislature and the governor of Texas is contracted to provide for me, and I am guaranteed, a republican form of government and a law remedy for my injuries and grievances.
The county Court of record must be reopened immediately as mandated by the laws of Texas and it's Constitution which you and your fellow Legislators have sworn to uphold under the pains and penalty of perjury. There is already a lawfully elected judge who has been denied his courtroom. Because the judge who was elected by the registered voters in the corporate democratic welfare trust elections, Ms. Kelleher, is a BAR CARD commercial agent, she is not competent for sitting as a judge in a law venue. However, concerning the lawful Article 5, Section 15 County Court of record and county Judge, we have such a judge already lawfully elected and all we need is the enforcement from you and your fellow legislators for obtaining a courtroom and having the county Clerk docket the cases.
I expect to hear from you within ten (10) days about what are your plans for bringing to the attention of the legislature that there must be a remedy of this injustice and violation of the law and Constitution by the BAR CARD commercial agents of this STATE who have completed a takeover of our lawful government and judiciary under the color of law. SENATOR DUELL YOU OR ANY OF YOUR FELLOW LEGISLATORS HAVE FAILED TO RESPONSE TO ME IN ANY FORM.
The lawful Article 5, Section 15 county Court of record must be re-opened. Tell me within ten (10) DAYS when you plan to begin abiding by your Official Oath and ensure that the court is re-opened without delay AS MANDATED BY LAW. THE COURT IS STILL CLOSED AND THE THIEF'S ARE STILL FREE.
IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING ONE OF THE THIEF'S IS NOW SUING THE MEDICAL BOARD IN AN AUSTIN COURT FOR TAKING HIS MEDICAL LICENSE FOR HIS DECEPTIVE ACTS.
Sincerely, Ralph-Kenneth, family of Evans
First petition 8 November 2004.
This NOTICE OF FAILURE TO RESPONSE FOR my Demand for CONGRESSIONAL
injunctive relief is delivered this 14th day of December 2004
to Senators Bob Deuell's office in Mesquite, in
NOTICE OF FAILURE TO RESPONSE AND DEFAULT - Posted January 10, 2005]
From:
Ralph-Kenneth, family of Evans
Mailing Location exact:
Notary Public
3352 Broadway Boulevard # 406
Garland, Texas
To:
Senator Bob Deuell
18601 LBJ Freeway, Suite 400
Mesquite, Texas
NOTICE OF FAILURE TO RESPONSE AND DEFAULT FOR my
Demand for CONGRESSIONAL injunctive relief and notice of criminal racketeering and sedition by members of the commercial association known as the TEXAS BAR ASSOCIATION operating in collusion with STATE, COUNTIES, and CITIES, all commercial trust entities, in violation of the laws of Texas and the Texas Constitution. Now I add in violation of Federal law and treaties made pursuant to international law.
Senator Deuell: I gave you notice and demand for congressional injunctive relief and notice of criminal racketeering and sedition by commercial entities created by misnomer, willful idem sonans, deceptive trade practices, lack of full disclosure, in want of jurisdiction, for and in the name of which the Texas Legislators create legislation, and for which is approved by the Governor in violation of the rules and laws of Texas and the Constitution for Texas, and approved by action of law by the acquiescence of the un-informed people who have faithfully placed in your hands their trust that their elected officials would not betray them and fall into a condition of sedition. You HAVE FAILED TO RESPONSE OR TAKE ANY ACTION TO RIGHT THE WRONG DONE TO ME OR MAKE AVAILABLE TO ME LAWFUL DUE PROCESS IN A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION. I now add damage done to 22 employees of TEXAS SPINE MEDICAL CENTERS, mostly women some are single mothers with children.
I as well as others in Texas have suffered regularly and on going thief of land, funds (Federal Reserve Notes, mortgage Notes and gold Coins) and liberty, inflicted upon us by the statutorily created commercial trust entities using copyrighted law and commercial chambers impersonating lawful courts in which we the people can not appear for want of license. YOU HAVE IGNORED MY AND THE PEOPLE’S RIGHT TO JUSTICE AND THE RIGHT OF REDRESS. Your nonfeasance has now caused the closing of 4 of the medical center in Texas causing loss of job of innocence mothers with children.
I have been denied due process, a republican form of government, redress and remedy by due course of law, all because the chief judge of the highest commercial Court in this THE STATE OF TEXAS has without delegation of authority issued an unlawful opinion that the lawful Article 5, Section 15 county court of record in collusion with the county judge, the county clerk, the county commissioners, the county sheriff and the STATE’S DISTRICT ATTORNEY did close and not accept any cases concerning the people and matters of law in violation of the laws of Texas and the Texas Constitution.
Most recently, BAR CARD commercial trust agents (BAR CARD YOLLICK, EDWARDS and BAR CARD RECEIVER FOR THE BAR CARD HOLDER’S OWN SELF ENRICHMENT) did used a parole violator and a tax violator Jacques Jaikaran for falsely fabricating commercial cases and used it for taking ,000.00 with the aid of MESQUITE’S BANK BAR CARD ATTORNEY and BAR CARD ATTORNEY EUGENE DUBOSE taking of my land located within the limits of Mesquite, Texas by using the improperly enacted STATE and COUNTY statutorily created commercial Courts. All of the actors participating in concert for the scheme and artifice for defrauding me out of my assets are all BAR CARD commercial welfare trust agents and members of this STATE OF TEXAS created perpetual monopoly known as the TEXAS BAR ASSOCIATION, and the Medical association and said BAR ASSOCIATION is uncontrolled and unregulated by any oversight agency answerable to the people.
This said BAR CARD association and the commercial Courts operated by their members excludes me and the people from remedy by requiring the licensing of anyone practicing inside the commercial chamber, and are using private copyrighted law for violating the laws of Texas and the Texas Constitution..
Senator Deuell you and your fellow Legislators have all taken the Article 16, Section 1 Official Oath to uphold the Constitutions for both, the State of Texas and the United States of America. If you have not then you all are without office. The county commissioners, county judge, sheriff, and county clerk have also taken the same oath.
I brought to your attention by petition my grievances and a few of the laws you and your fellow legislators are required for upholding as a responsibility for taking the oath contracting with the people for specific performance and ascending to office. YOU DID NOT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGE IN ANY FORM MY PETITION
You all are required by law to provide me and all fellow Texans the following:
Preservation of a republican form of government as mandated by the Texas Constitution Article 1, Section 2. I want to remind you that a republican form of government is not a subsidiary commercial welfare trust enterprise known alternatively as this STATE, or this State or THE STATE OF TEXAS, which are all names of a subsidiary welfare trust enterprise of a national socialist democracy cestui que welfare trust enterprise headquartered in Washington, known as the UNITED STATES or THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA which said trusts exist by action simply because the people have not been given full disclosure of how the government and judiciary were taken over, and the people do not know how to restore their lawful government WITHOUT THE AID OF THEIR ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO HAVE THE DUTY AND WHO HAVE SWORN AN OATH TO DO SO.
Preservation of the right of local self-government, unimpaired. (that means county government by Law, and not a STATE administrative welfare trust by statute).
Equality under law is mandatory. That means that the BAR ASSOCIATION is answerable to the people, and the people must have a court for remedy that is not operated by BAR CARD commercial agents. The practice here in Dallas of the civil District Attorney, a commercial agent of the commercial side of our State of Texas, and a BAR member, telling the County Clerk what she can and cannot file must be ended immediately. By what delegation of authority do commercial agents have the authority to interfere with the government of the people and dictate to a man in full capacity what he can and cannot place in the record for the public, or dictate to the recorder of the county what she can and cannot record for the record of the public? You must address this issue at once. This issue goes hand into glove with the county Clerk being the docket clerk for the county Court of record. By what authority do BAR CARD commercial agents dictate to the county clerk the scope and requirements and authority of her OR HIS office?
The jury of peers shall have the right to determine the law and the facts in all cases. That means that the county Court of record must be reopen and the clerk must advertise for a jury pool of competent people who have read and understand the Constitution and who are competent for law remedy, and who are not members of the democratic welfare trust and which said members of the democratic welfare trust are not competent to reach a law remedy or sit in judgment of a case concerning law and a non-member of the welfare trust. See Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U.S. 288 (1936), and Great Falls Mfg. Co. v. Attorney General, 124 U. S. 581.
No action can begin in any court without probable cause, meaning a declaration from a victim supported by oath or affirmation. A BAR CARD commercial agent or one of the commercial agent minions in uniform writing up a complaint is not a declaration from a victim. We the people are not commercial person actors and violators. We are people and we are entitled to all of the protections expressed in Article 1 of the Texas Constitution, especially Article 1, Section 10.
I gave you notice you and your fellow Legislators to read Article 1 Section 10 of the Texas Constitution, which said Constitution you have taken an oath to uphold. Section 10 is being violated by every BAR CARD commercial agent prosecutor and every BAR CARD commercial chamber judge for every case against one of the people who is a non-member of the democratic welfare trust that is brought into these commercial Courts, which said commercial Courts have been unlawfully enacted in the name of this THE STATE OF TEXAS allegedly with the authority of the State of Texas. By what authority does the legislature of the lawful State of Texas enact legislation in the name of this State, THE STATE OF TEXAS?
The writ of habeas corpus is a writ of right, and shall never be suspended. Article 3, Section 62 is very emphatic in the expression of the fact that no matter if the elected officers of the State of Texas decided to suspend the constitution and the lawful government and run under an emergency corporation government, the rights of the people remaining non-members of the democratic trust would be protected. This protection of the rights of the people tracks the protection contained in the footnote of the United States Code Title 5, Section 559 footnotes indicating that the writers of our Texas Constitution were far advanced in their determination for protecting the rights of the people in times of greed, deception, and emergency rule advocated by BAR CARD commercial agents. A statutory commercial writ of Habeas Corpus submitted to the Court of Criminal Appeals, which is one of the commercial chambers is not a Writ of Right as required by the Texas Constitution. A Writ of Habeas Corpus that invokes the Law that is denied by the Court of Criminal Appeals and the Texas Supreme Court with a terse statement about lack of jurisdiction is not guaranteeing remedy for those of us who are non-members of and foreign (strangers) to the democratic welfare trust operated in this STATE.
As mandated by the Texas Constitution Article 1, Section 13, all courts shall be open. (One of those said courts is the Law side of the article 5 Section 15 constitutional county Court of record. The Lawful constitutional county Court of record of the people cannot be closed by an opinion of the chief judge of the SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, which SUPREME COURT is a commercial chamber of the democratic welfare trust scheme.) For every injury done him, in his lands, goods, person or reputation, it is mandated by the Texas Constitution that every man shall have remedy by due course of law. No where in law or statute of the state of Texas is it published that the people who are non-members of the democratic welfare trust must contract with commercial agents of this THE STATE OF TEXAS and use copyrighted statute and rules belonging to West publishing company, which is a subsidiary corporation of the Thompson group, which is incorporated in the City of London, England. I and many others are without remedy by law. We are respecters of copyright law and we know who we are and our law venue. By what delegation of authority did the chief judge of the BAR CARD operated commercial chamber known as THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS issue an opinion closing the county Court of record of the Article 5, Section 15 county Courts? You must address this question. You must provide for me the answer about where and how the said BAR CARD commercial agent chief judge got the delegation of authority for closing the constitutional county Court of record of the people.
The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate. The Texas Constitution at Article 1, Section 19 is explicit and requires that a trial by jury of peers by law of the land be offered to those of us who know what is that venue. Specifically, a jury trial wherein an advisory jury panel of legally disabled democratic welfare trust members, (see above Ashwander and Great Falls), who are impersonating a lawful jury, who have not studied the law, and who have about as much brainpower as a herd of cows, and who are specifically culled during the jury selection process for their stupidity and eagerness for accepting fiction in place of fact, by the BAR CARD district attorneys, again, they are commercial agents of the democratic welfare trust known as this STATE, is not a trial by jury as mandated by Article 1, Section 19. You must restore the remedy for the people who are not subject to benefits.
No citizen of Texas shall be deprived of life, liberty, property, privileges or immunities, or in any manner disfranchised, except by the due of the law of the land. Specifically, for those of us who are not members of the democratic welfare trust, we cannot be forced to use copyrighted statute in commercial chambers of this STATE operated exclusively by BAR CARD commercial agents. By what authority must I be forced to contract with a BAR CARD attorney operating commercial chamber which is inferior to my constitutionally protected court and remedy?
Article 1, Section 29, was specifically placed into the constitution for protecting the rights of the people who are not members of the democratic welfare trust of this STATE. The Section 29 expresses in part: “To guard against transgressions of the high powers herein (notice it does not say higher powers) delegated, (notice it says delegated) we declare everything in this ‘Bill of Rights’ is excepted out of the general powers of government, (that means acts of the legislature, meaning statute and commercial chamber judges are not superior to the people), and shall forever remain inviolate, and all laws contrary thereto, or to the following provisions, shall be void.” Specifically there is no authority by law for the closing of the constitutional county Court of record. The Article 5, Section 15 county Court of record must be immediately reopened for business. The commissioners are to set the time and term for the court and the clerk is to docket the causes and the judge is to seat the Court from a pool of men carefully chosen unlike the choosing of advisory jury panels for their stupidity and ability to accept fiction in place of fact. You must address this issue at once. In actuality, the State of Texas does not exist without there being a court for remedy for the people who are not members of the commercial welfare trust. There being no lawful government here in Texas, then remedy may lay in another law venue external to Texas for enforcement of the formation documents of Texas. INTERNATIONAL LAW REQUIRES ALL OFFICIALS OF A NATION FOLLOW AND HERETO THAT NATION’S CONSTITUTION.
Article 3, Section 62 specifically expresses that all of Article I of the Constitution of Texas known as the “Bill of Rights” “shall not be in any manner affected, amended, impaired, suspended, repealed or suspended hereby” by the legislators should the legislators ever decide to suspend the constitution or operate the State of Texas as a commercial welfare trust enterprise known as this STATE and/or THE STATE OF TEXAS, or to unlawfully enact legislation for this THE STATE OF TEXAS and make claims on the title pages of the legislation that such legislation of this STATE is enacted by the authority of the State of Texas, which is absolute nonsense, unlawful, without delegation of authority, and is sedition. How many of these acts have you given your approval? Check the law. An unrecorded voice vote does not suspend the rules. A 4/5ths record vote is required for suspending the rules and the constitution.
Senator Deuell, you have taken an oath to uphold the laws of the state of Texas and the Texas Constitution. I accept your Official Oath as your contract with me and the people and I expect you and your fellow legislators to uphold the laws of Texas and the Texas Constitution. The Article 5, Section 15, county Court of record has been closed without delegation of authority by an unlawful opinion of a BAR CARD commercial chamber agents operating for the unjust self enrichment of the commercial agents of this STATE. There being no authority for the issuing of the said opinion, the causing of the ignorant county Court judges to close the law side of our courts is a crime of sedition.
The county commissioners here in the county of Dallas refuse to fix the time and term of the county Court of record. The clerk has refused to docket the petitions for redress. And the county Judge, Ms. Margaret Kelleher, who is legally disabled from holding the position of county Judge because she is a BAR CARD commercial agent from the commercial venue, has refused to seat the Court and open the Court for business probably with the understanding that she not competent for holding a session of a law venue Court.
The unlawfully enacted statutory courts operating under the banner of this THE STATE OF TEXAS, which said banner is prohibited by the Texas Constitution Article 5, Section 12, and the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules 15, 99, 114, 176, the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 1.23 and over 40 other cites of rules of prohibition for running writs and process in the name of this THE STATE OF TEXAS are in want of jurisdiction of me and my private property and matters affecting me, and the same lack of jurisdiction applies to other sovereigns in full capacity similarly situated as myself.
THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS has concurred to this fact by dismissing all of my petitions for redress for want of jurisdiction except a writ of habeas corpus. I am without a Court for redress by law and due process by law. You and your fellow legislators are required to ensure that the remedy protected to me by the Texas Constitution is available to me. As a member nation in the united States of America, the legislature and the governor of Texas is contracted to provide for me, and I am guaranteed, a republican form of government and a law remedy for my injuries and grievances.
The county Court of record must be reopened immediately as mandated by the laws of Texas and it’s Constitution which you and your fellow Legislators have sworn to uphold under the pains and penalty of perjury. There is already a lawfully elected judge who has been denied his courtroom. Because the judge who was elected by the registered voters in the corporate democratic welfare trust elections, Ms. Kelleher, is a BAR CARD commercial agent, she is not competent for sitting as a judge in a law venue. However, concerning the lawful Article 5, Section 15 County Court of record and county Judge, we have such a judge already lawfully elected and all we need is the enforcement from you and your fellow legislators for obtaining a courtroom and having the county Clerk docket the cases.
I expect to hear from you within ten (10) days about what are your plans for bringing to the attention of the legislature that there must be a remedy of this injustice and violation of the law and Constitution by the BAR CARD commercial agents of this STATE who have completed a takeover of our lawful government and judiciary under the color of law. SENATOR DEUELL YOU OR ANY OF YOUR FELLOW LEGISLATORS HAVE FAILED TO RESPONSE TO ME IN ANY FORM. NOW SENATOR DEUELL I GIVE YOU AND YOUR FELLOW LEGISLATORS NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND YOUR FAILURE TO PERFORM YOUR DUTY AND UPHOLD YOUR OATHS OF OFFICE. THAT CLAIM THAT YOU CAN DO NOTHING WON'T HOLD AS A DEFENCE FOR YOUR FAILURE YOU HAVE INVESTIGATIVE AND IMPEACHMENT POWER.
The lawful Article 5, Section 15 county Court of record must be re-opened. Tell me within ten (10) DAYS when you plan to begin abiding by your Official Oath and ensure that the court is re-opened without delay AS MANDATED BY LAW. THE COURT IS STILL CLOSED AND THE THIEVES ARE STILL FREE.
IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING ONE OF THE THIEVES IS NOW SUING THE MEDICAL BOARD IN AN AUSTIN COURT FOR TAKING HIS MEDICAL LICENSE FOR HIS DECEPTIVE ACTS. As of this date I understand that He lost and no longer has a medical license for his violation of his parole, which he was acting in violation during this matter.
NOTICE OF DEFAULT FOR FAILURE TO ACT. All state remedies have been exhausted in this matter. The Supreme court has had notice the appeals court has had notice the attorney general has had notice, the judicial affairs committee has had notice, the bar association has had notice, the federal banking authority has had notice of check theft by the Plaintiff the attorneys by acts of barratry including the bank’s attorney who charged ,000.00 for his part in the barratry, the Montgomery County District Attorney has had notice, The Dallas County Clerk, The Judge, The Commissioners and the District Attorney all have had notice. The Dallas county Grand Jury was petition for investigation of this matter, the County Clerk and The District Attorney obstructed that petition. If the Grad Jury had been allowed to investigate this matter there is sufficient evidence in the public records to convict the Plaintiffs, the judges, the attorneys along with the bank officers of deceptive trade practice and commercial fraud and denial of due process. I have previously sent you evidence from the public records and I am sending you more that was to be presented to the Grand Jury. I send this to so you can investigate sense Daniel Boudreau and I along with the other crime victims have been damaged and denied access to any law remedy by the Commercial Bar Card Attorneys acting unlawfully helping the Plaintiffs to complete their fraud upon the victims.
I have marked and attached the evidence that was taken from the public records if you do not understand it Daniel, I and others will be glad to sit down with you and go over it.
Again I give you notice if there is any reason that I am barred from a law remedy for the damage to me in the matters presented to you by petitions, please notify me immediately.
Sincerely,
Ralph-Kenneth, family of Evans First petition 8 November 2004. second petition 14th day of December 2004
This NOTICE OF FAILURE TO RESPONSE AND DEFAULT FOR my Demand for CONGRESSIONAL injunctive relief is delivered this 10th day of January, A.D. 2005 to Senators Bob Deuell’s office in Mesquite, in Texas.
By me ___________________________________
cc: Notary Public
3352 Broadway Boulevard # 406
Garland, Texas
Levying a Tax? - Posted March 3, 2005
Ken wonders why everyone is not sending like messages (letters and e-mails!)
If you are part of the system, pay your tax.
If you are not part of the system, act like it!
The letter below has been added to the CD and is available now!
Send us copies of your letters for reference. Also send us copies of the replies if there are any.
From; Ralph family of Evans
February 25, 2005
To: Jerry Jones
901 W. State Street
Garland, Texas federal zone, 75046-1407
Third Request for Information
Dear Jerry, Again I ask you to disclose to me who or what are you levying a tax against.
It is evident the question are too hard for you to understand, so I will try to make them simple so you answer with a simple Yes or No.
1. You are acting as an agent or you are acting in collision with The Dallas Central appraisal District?____
2. You are levying a tax against me?______
3. You are levying a tax against RALPH K. EVANS and holding me as surety for the tax debt charged against RALPH K. EVANS? _____
4. You are Levying a tax against RALPH K. EVANS without a surety but are sending the notice of Tax levy to me?______
5. You are levying a tax against 0000 Mallard Park BLK A LOT 0 Mallard Cove an addition to the City of Rowlett, Texas and holding me as surety for the tax debt for 0000 Mallard Park BLK A LOT 0 Mallard Cove an addition to the City of Rowlett, Texas? ________
6. You are levying a tax against the City of Rowlett for it's addition and have sent the tax to me for 0000 Mallard Park BLK A LOT 0 Mallard Cove and you want me the pay the tax for the City of Rowlett?_____
7. The tax levy was sent to me by mistake?______
You have twenty (20) days to answer truthfully please do so with a yes or no in ink. Sign under penalty of perjury and return to me. Mail location Exact and certain: Notary Public 0052 Broadway Blvd # 000 City of Garland, Texas
====================
From: "evans" <evansr@xxxxxmail.com>
To: John.Carona@senate.state.tx.us
Subject: Ballot Election law Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:04:51 -0600
Why are you folks violating the Texas ballot law? Texas ballot, "A ballot that the voter marks for the candidates that he or she does not want elected."
====================
From: "evans" <evansr@xxxxxmail.com>
To: <CPrince@sos.state.tx.us>
Subject: Temp. Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:35:59 -0600
All I want to know is who is this entity known as THE STATE OF TEXAS that the attorney are using to run their process in the name of;. THEY ARE USING THE AUTHORITY OF THAT NAMED ENTITY and I have a right to know who or what it is seeing they have taken funds in the amount of 500,000.00 a 1st lien payment owed me without due maybe due process is prohibited under that name. So I have a right to know. Ralph
Posted March 13 2005 Two Items
Levying a Tax? - NOTICE AND DEMAND: Fourth Request for Information
Texas people are no longer allowed to vote in Texas
Item 1 -
Levying a Tax? - NOTICE AND DEMAND: Fourth Request for Information
How do you like this? It is evident they want me to pay a tax on the Street, or Ham Sandwich, because on the bill it listed no land!
From; Ralph family of Evans
March 12, 2005
To: Jerry Jones
901 W. State Street
Garland, Texas federal zone, 75046-1407
NOTICE AND DEMAND: Fourth Request for Information
Dear Jerry
Again I give you notice and demand to disclose to me who or what you are levying a tax against. Your papers are vague and unclear. Therefore I am again giving notice and demand for clarification. Your papers claim it is a tax levy in something but I do not know what that something for 4,730.60 you want. Suppose I send you jelly-beans it is unclear to me what you want and what you are levying a tax on. It is plain it not a tax on my land, you state there is 0.0000 acres. All is left is the city of Rowlett's street and number and my recipe for a ham sandwich title RALPH K. EVANS my private copyright property.
It is evident the question are too hard for you to understand, so I will try again to make them simple so you answer with a simple Yes or No.
1. You are acting as an agent and you are acting in contact with The Dallas Central appraisal District you claim is giving you the tax for levy? ____
2. You are levying a tax against me? ______
3. You are levying a tax against RALPH K. EVANS a recipe for a ham sandwich and holding me as surety for the tax debt charged against RALPH K. EVANS a recipe for a ham sandwich? _____
4. You are Levying a tax against RALPH K. EVANS my copyright ham sandwich recipe without a surety but are sending the notice of Tax levy to me?______
5. You are levying a tax against 0000 Mallard Park BLK A LOT 6 Mallard Cove an addition to the City of Rowlett, Texas and holding me as surety for the tax debt for 0000 Mallard Park BLK A LOT 6 Mallard Cove an addition to the City of Rowlett, Texas? ________
6. You are levying a tax against the City of Rowlett for it's street and addition and have sent the tax to me for 0000 Mallard Park BLK A LOT 6 Mallard Cove addition and you want me the pay the tax for the City of Rowlett?_____
7. The tax levy was sent to me by mistake?______
8. You want the tax to be paid in jelly-beans?______
You were given twenty (20) days to answer truthfully but you did not answer instead you sent me another paper you claim is a tax levy that is vague and ambiguous please answer within ten (10) days do so with a yes or no in ink. Sign under penalty of perjury and return to me. Mail location Exact and certain only: Notary Public 0000 Broadway Blvd # 000 City of Garland, Texas.
________________________
Your papers are here in attached and returned for clarification.
Item 2 -
Texas people are no longer allowed to vote in Texas
Only 14th amendment citizens can vote in Texas. The Texas people cannot not vote for officers in Texas. I believe that violates international treaty laws and the Texas "Bill of Rights". The secretary of State's don't even have a Texas Ballot form. The office only has forms for U.S. citizens created by the 14th amendment who are wards of this State. Also to be a Notary you must prove you are a ward of this State. Those people in Austin have got so far outside the law they can never get back. Their fraud is stacked up to heaven!!
Request for Voter Registration Applications
To be eligible to register in Texas, you must:
Be a U.S. citizen;
Be a resident of the county;
Be 18 years old (you may register at 17 years and 10 months);
Not a convicted felon (unless a person's sentence is completed, including any probation or parole)
Not declared mentally incapacitated by a court of law
For more information, please read the Voter Registration in Texas pamphlet
[TEXAS Identified - Posted March 27, 2005]
THE STATE OF TEXAS IDENTIFIED
THE STATE OF TEXAS is an unincorporated religious association cult. This Cult is owned and controlled by Satan. This Cult is operated out of the middle temple bar headquartered in the City of London, State England. This Satanic association has many names and operates in all the 50 states of America, but this paper is only concerned with THE STATE OF TEXAS, herein after known as Cult and its members operating in The State of Texas.
All the members of this Cult, THE STATE OF TEXAS, are all issued identifying numbers such as license numbers, social security numbers (SSN), taxpayer I.D. numbers etc, which are used as evidence of contract. This Cult has many satellite associations such as DALLAS COUNTY, CITY OF DALLAS etc. It also has policy enforcement officers known as Police and Black Robed Priest called judges for enforcing the Cult’s policies. The members of this Cult believe in child sacrifice, also known as abortion, and their revenues are collected by a numbers of means such as taxes, fines, forfeitures, prison bonds issued from their robbery, theft and murder to name a few. This criminal cult run process using fraudulent commercial process and fraudulent commercial paper upon the soil of Texas in violation of Texas law, United States of America law and treaties made pursuant to international law. (See. TRCP 822 These rules may be known and cited as the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and all or part of Rule 2, 15, 99b, 114, 116, 117a, 176, 309, 533, 534, 593, 612, 629, 661, 681, 687, 699 and 816.
This Cult was established in Texas in 1845 when a group broke their sworn oath they had sworn to the people of Texas and started up this Cult and called it a GOVERNMENT known as THE STATE OF TEXAS. The members of this Cult volunteer or are recruited by their Police by force of arms and are supported by the others members in what they call a jury using their Black Robed Priest in chambers they call a COURT and agents of THE TEXAS BAR ASSOCIATION claiming that numbered membership in this Religious Cult is mandate by the law. This Religious Cult is set up to look like a government: it has a legislative agency, executive agency and a judicial agency in fact is THE TEXAS BAR ASSOCIATION. This Cult also has a charter called a Constitution, which they change at will.
When members join this Cult they are no longer allowed to use their Christian name, but instead they are required to take a new name. The new name is deceptively similar to their given and family name except it is written in all capital letters. Once you take a number from them they will write your name in all capital letters and have you sign unconscionable agreements to become an all capital letter Cult member. Once you become a member of this Cult association you lose your freeman status and your rights you have, when you agreed you became a slave to this Religious Cult and the only right you have is the right to vote for the evil Satanic minions that are to rule over you. The recruitment is without full disclosure by the use of deceptive trade practice and force of arms.
Notice is and has been given the officers of all three branches of the government of the State of Texas who are acting in collusion with this religious Cult and have been given notice of their unlawful acts and deeds. The officers are not only acting in collusion with this religious cult the officers have perjured their oath of office and are acting in violation of the Texas “Bill of Rights” and treaties made pursuant to international law.
Ralph, family Evans and not a member of the religious cult THE STATE OF TEXAS
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted April 7, 2005]
From: evans
To: Carolyn Prince
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:47 AM
Subject: REQUEST: DISCLOSE WHAT IS THE STATE OF TEXAS
TO: Secretary of State of Texas
DISCLOSE WHAT IS THE STATE OF TEXAS
Disclose what is, or who is, THE STATE OF TEXAS?
Who accepts process for the entity THE STATE OF TEXAS?
The entity THE STATE OF TEXAS agents have taken $500,000.00 and my land valued at least $350,000.00. Denied me any kind of due process in violation of the laws of The State of Texas and international treaty law.
I want it back.
Notice and demand for an immediate response. This date 3-15-05
Ralph
From: evans
To: Carolyn Prince
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:47 AM
Subject: REQUEST: DISCLOSE WHAT IS THE STATE OF TEXAS
SECOND REQUEST this week.
TO: Secretary of State of Texas
DISCLOSE WHAT IS THE STATE OF TEXAS
Disclose what is, or who is, THE STATE OF TEXAS?
Who accepts process for the entity THE STATE OF TEXAS?
The entity THE STATE OF TEXAS agents have taken $500,000.00 and my land valued at least $350,000.00. Denied me any kind of due process in violation of the laws of The State of Texas and international treaty law.
I want it back.
Notice and demand for an immediate response. This date 3-15-05
Ralph
From: evans
To: Carolyn Prince
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 7:47 AM
Subject: REQUEST: DISCLOSE WHAT IS THE STATE OF TEXAS
This is the fourth Request this week!
-----
TO: Secretary of State of Texas
DISCLOSE WHAT IS THE STATE OF TEXAS. It is evident that you are not going to response. It is evident if you did respond it would place such a great liability on you and the bar members, the house and senate and the governor that it would cost all of you your liberty for the rest of your life. It is further evident that all lawful civil authority of the state of Texas has broken down and the government is being run by a criminal rackteering cartel terrorist group by and through the agents of the bar association and are wagging war upon the people of Texas using the name of THE STATE OF TEXAS and refusing to disclose the principals of said entity known as THE STATE OF TEXAS. I am asking you again for the forth time this week:
Disclose what is, or who is, THE STATE OF TEXAS?
Who accepts process service for the entity THE STATE OF TEXAS?
The entity THE STATE OF TEXAS agents have taken $500,000.00 and my land valued at least $350,000.00. Denied me any kind of due process in violation of the laws of The State of Texas and international treaty law.
I want it back.
Notice and demand for an immediate response. This date 3-17-05
Ralph
To:"Carolyn Prince" <CPrince@sos.state.tx.us>
From: "evans" <evansr@joimail.com>
Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:07:32
Texas open records request
From: Ralph, family of Evans a natural man with all rights reserve March 19, 2005
To: Secretary of the state of Texas; Roger Williams
Dear Roger Williams
I have asked you time after time for information. The information I have asked for; is who or what is the entity known as THE STATE OF TEXAS?
You have failed and refused to answer.
Therefore I again make my request pursuant to the Texas open records act.
Who or what is the entity known as THE STATE OF TEXAS?
Are the agents of the entity THE STATE OF TEXAS running fraudulent commercial process, using fraudulent commercial papers in violation of the Texas rules of civil procedure and used that fraudulent commercial process and fraudulent commercial papers to takes my liberty, part of my life and my private property that has been taken by said agents. Not only mine but most all other people of The State of Texas?
Ralph
You may response by E-mail using a electronic signature to me, evansr@joimail.com.
If you prefer to response by mail you may do so certain and exact to: notary public 3352 Broadway Blvd # 406 In the limits of the city of Garland, Texas state.
"Carolyn Prince" CPrince@sos.state.tx.us
From: "evans" evansr@joimail.com
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:26:46 -0600
Subject: [wtpcc] request for court information
To: Secretary of State for Texas
Mr. Secretary
Do your records show any Article 5 Section 15 court mandated by law the constitution for Texas open and doing business in Texas?
Ralph family of Evans
To: "Robert Sumners" RSumners@sos.state.tx.us
From: "evans" evansr@joimail.com
[wtpcc] Re: Open Records Request
Dear Robert Summers
All the courts and all the attorney(s) are running process in the name THE
STATE OF TEXAS. Now let me understand what you have just told me QUOTE: We
do not have any documents responsive to your request, UN-QUOTE. Now let me
be sure I understand The Secretary of State' office has no record or any
knowledge of any such entity doing business in the State of Texas. Is this
what you have said? Then do you have any knowledge what these courts are and
by what authority they are doing business in Texas? Sir you personally
remove a ucc1 lean by order of one of these courts now surely you know from
where the courts authority comes. It is a fact the authority don't come from
the people of Texas.
Ralph-Kenneth
P.S. I am addressed as Ralph-Kenneth not Mr. Evans
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Sumners" <RSumners@sos.state.tx.us>
To: <evansr@joimail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11:58 AM
Subject: Open Records Request
Dear Mr. Evans,
We received your question, "Who or what is the entity known as THE STATE OF TEXAS." We do not have any documents responsive to your request, and the Texas Open Records Act does not require this office to perform legal research or to answer general questions.
See Attorney General's Open Records Decision No. 563 (1990).
Robert Sumners
Director of
Corporations
Office of the
Secretary of State
From: evans
To: RSumners@sos.state.tx.us
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 8:05 AM
Subject: To Secretary of State for Texas
TO: Secretary of State of Texas
Seat of government for the State of Texas
City of Austin March 22, 2005
It is evident from the response I received from one of your employees Robert summers answering on your behalf acting as your agent, that your office has no record of any entity in Texas known as THE STATE OF TEXAS. But that same employee removed a recorded UCC1 that I paid your office over $60.00 as a recording fee. The employee claimed at the time he removed the recording that he removed it by order issued to him by a judge of a COURT of THE STATE OF TEXAS. Now said employee is claiming your office has no record of an entity known as THE STATE OF TEXAS. Now if your office must either re-record the UCC1 or Disclose to me what is, or who is, THE STATE OF TEXAS?
Ralph-Kenneth
Melinda Nickless" <MNickless@sos.state.tx.us>
From: "evans" <evansr@joimail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 07:07:43 -0600
Subject: [wtpcc] Re: Texas Ballot - Ralph-Kenneth (MN)
You have failed to supply me a copy of a true Texas ballot! It is evident you don't have one or you are denying me the right to cast my ballot, in your terms the right to vote.
To: "Robert Sumners" <RSumners@sos.state.tx.us>,
"Carolyn Prince" <CPrince@sos.state.tx.us>
From: "evans" <evansr@joimail.com>
Sun, 3 Apr 2005 08:06:14
To: Secretary of the State of Texas
The bottom of this E-mail contains a warrant issued by an alleged judge in the matter of THE STATE OF TEXAS vs Steven C. Coppenhaven.
Notice and demand for disclosure who is the officer that is designated receiver for service of process for THE STATE OF TEXAS in the State of Texas and who or what is this entity THE STATE OF TEXAS.
You may believe you are free to ignore the request as in the past, but not so, agents operating in the name of this entity has taken over 145 days of my liberty, a $500,000.00 check and land valued over $350,00.00 and land valued over $100,000.00 and 1700 Federal reserved Notes by theft. A response is required immediately.
Ralph-Kenneth: family of Evans this date 4-3-5
From: "evans" evansr@joimail.com
To: secretary@sos.state.tx.us
Subject: Request for information pursuant to the Texas open record act
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:24:50 -0600
Request for in formation pursuant to the Texas open record act.
To: Secretary of State
P.O. Box 12887
Austin, Texas 78711-2887
Request for information on entity known as THE STATE OF TEXAS.
Is the, THE STATE OF TEXAS (herein after entity) an Agency of the State of Texas?
Who and how was this entity created?
Is this entity incorporated or unincorporated?
Is this entity licensed to do business in The State of Texas?
Is this entity a judicial agency?
Does this entity have authority to run legal process in the name of The State of Texas?
Does this entity or any party including any member of the Texas Bar Association have any authority to run legal process in any type action weather it be civil or criminal in the name of this entity?
Does your office have any knowledge of this entity running legal process for The State of Texas?
Does your office have any knowledge of any authority of this entity to run any legal process for or in the State of Texas?
Does this entity or any agencies of this entity have any authority to issue license for or in The State of Texas?
In view of:
(Texas Penal Code Sec. 1.07. Definitions 26) ``Individual'' means a human being who is alive, including an unborn child at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth.) Do you have any knowledge of any agency or any entity issuing any license for the creation of abortions clinics upon the land of Texas?
Do you have any knowledge of any abortion clinics doing business upon the land of Texas or in The State of Texas?
In view of the following taken from the Texas Penal Code:
2003 Note: The changes in law made by Ch. 822, Art. 2 apply only to an offense committed on or after the effective date of Ch. 822. For purposes of this section, an offense is committed before the effective date of Ch. 822 if any element of the offense occurs before September 1, 2003. Stats. 2003 78th Leg. Sess. Ch. 822 Section 2.07(a).
Sec. 1.08. Preemption.
Text
No governmental subdivision or agency may enact or enforce a law that makes any conduct covered by this code an offense subject to a criminal penalty. This section shall apply only as long as the law governing the conduct proscribed by this code is legally enforceable.
Do you know or have any knowledge of any agency or entity of any judicial, executive or legislative branch or any governmental subdivision using the Texas penal to prosecute in any court in The State of Texas or any COURT of this entity?
Do you know or have any knowledge of THE STATE OF TEXAS courts operating under the Clearfield doctrine, and if so explain?
Do you know or have any knowledge of THE STATE OF TEXAS, or any subdivision thereof being syndicated?
Do you know or have any knowledge of THE STATE OF TEXAS, or any subdivision thereof being syndicated by any another name or entity?
Do you know or have any knowledge of THE STATE OF TEXAS, or any subdivision thereof receiving publication by the Council on Foreign Relations promoting the stripping of sovereignty of the State of Texas?
Do you know or have any knowledge why the county courts of record have been closed in Texas and by what authority they have been closed?
Response is required pursuant to the law of Texas.
Ralph-Kenneth family of Evans, one of the sovereign people of Texas
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted April 26, 2005]
The following two letters, e-mails to sosstate.tx.us, have been added to the CD under Behind the Scenes and the Website: http://wtpcc.freeservers.com/
To: Robert Sumners RSumners@sos.state.tx.us ;
Carolyn Prince CPrince@sos.state.tx.us
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 1:58 PM
Subject: You have failed to answer WHAT IS THE STATE OF TEXAS
AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT;
The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State. (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239)
The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT! (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925))
The "CERTIFICATE" from the State Supreme Court:
ONLY authorizes,
To practice Law "IN COURTS" As a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.
Can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT, INFANTS, PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND (SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.)
"CERTIFICATE" IS NOT A LICENSE to practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION, nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM!!!
The "STATE BAR" CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!! It is a "UNION DUES CARD”.
The "BAR" is a "PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION."
1. Like the Actors Union, Painters Union, etc.
2. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license. ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE.
It is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.
The State Bar is;
An Unconstitutional Monopoly.
AN ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE;
Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution.
There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive within a state as the BAR is attempting. BAR members have invaded all branches of government and are attempting to control de jure government as agents of a foreign entity!
It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been perpetrated on the people of America. The American Bar is an offshoot from London Lawyers' Guild and was established by people with invasive monopolistic goals in mind. In 1909 they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois and had the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the ABA, could practice law and hold all the key positions in law enforcement and the making of laws. At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of America.
The BAR ASSOCIATION then sent organizers to all the other states and explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by its bylaws and cannons. They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois organization. California joined in 1927 and a few reluctant states and their lawyers waited until the 1930's to join when the treasonous act became DE FACTO and the Citizen's became captives.
Under this system, the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the lower class. This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor the right and have unlawfully substituted them in place of Constitutional Laws. The Constitution was written in plain English and the Statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of Congress how each law should be used and not the opinions of various Judges as the codes list. Any normal person can read the Constitution and Statutes and understand them without any trouble.
The public in California was shocked to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction over the Bar Association or its members. The state does not accredit the law schools or hold Bar examinations. They do not issue state licenses to LAWYERS. The Bar Association accredits all the law schools, holds their private examinations and selects the students they will accept in their organization and issues them so-called license but keeps the fees for themselves. The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer.
They also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships and various other offices in the State. Only the Bar Association or their designated committees can remove any of these lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the Bar. On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial Committee's, stated in essence that the Bar should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot.
This is contrary to both State and Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted By and For the People as a Sovereign UNITY of Independent States of We The People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers. This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated and headquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of California or any other state. The only recourse is through this initiative process and vote by the people.
After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence, "This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws and run a government as well as or better than royalty and the blue bloods of Europe." The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better than they are and can do a better job than they can before the courts of America.
Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, no where is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation. Corporations are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the American people and are operating under implied consent and power which they have usurped and otherwise stolen from the people. By RIGHT AND LAW THEY HAVE NO POWER, AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION, and must be put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for FREEDOM.
The U.S. Constitution GUARANTEES to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN FORM of government. Any other form of government is FORBIDDEN. No public officer or branch of government can be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES and NOT republics. Also, the lawyers have made themselves 1st Class Citizens, where many public offices and branches of government are open to lawyers only.
All other people are limited to only two branches of government and to only certain offices in those two branches of government, making all people who are non-lawyers into 2nd class subject citizens. When the courts belong to the people, as the United States Constitution REQUIRES, (Article IV, Section 4, we the people, will NEVER rule against themselves.) In these Unconstitutional courts foreign tribunals (hoodlum centers), "men" in black dresses, that are Unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY. (Article 1, Section 9 and 10) dispense a perverted ideology, where the people are terrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE CULT (lawyers and lawyer judges in the courtrooms).
The legislative branch of government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of Orders to people, as a fiction court or a court/corporation for profit and gain cannot reach parity with a lawful man. ONLY presidents and governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and lawyer-judges are unconstitutionally granting PARDONS with "immunity from prosecution."
Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures; etc. This is Unconstitutional "lawyer system," only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the fiction/for profit and gain courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court. Anything else is Bill of Attainder, NOT permitted under the U.S. Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10).
The U.S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to the ASSISTANCE of counsel and this ASSISTANCE of counsel CAN BE ANYONE THE ACCUSED CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION.
LAWYERS and LAWYER-JUDGES: Created Unconstitutional "lawyer system" pre-trial "motions" and "Hearings" to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC litigation’s, which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the U.S. Constitution, and Article 1, as this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred times over. Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS. When a criminal is freed on a TECHNICALITY, HE IS FREED BECAUSE OF A FIX and a PAY-OFF, as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY NOT BY ANY "TECHNICALITY."
Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL LAWYER-JUDGES HAVE TO DISQUALIFY THEMSELVES, AS THERE CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL and also there would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because "OFFICERS" OF THE COURT ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BENCH.
These same LAWYER-JUDGES are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OF DOLLARS annually, all in violation of conflict of interest laws. As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any law, constitution or justice. There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS.
CASE "LAW" IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL: As CASE "LAW" IS ENACTED BY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either "Yes" or "No." The lawyer-judge also tampers, fixes, and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he "rules" certain evidence and the truth to be inadmissible.
This makes the trial and transcript FIXED and RIGGED, because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS. Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government, as they have the Unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Article 1, Section 9 and 10), "Officer of the court." Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only 2 of the 3 branches of government. Lawyers as 1st class citizens, can be hired or elected to any of the three branches of government.
Lawyers, "Officers of the Court," in the Judicial Branch, are Unconstitutionally in 2 branches of government AT THE SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or legislative branches. This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the conflict of interest laws. District attorneys and State's attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the grand juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyer-judges.
The U.S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations (Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now. That is why all judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U.S. Constitution, NOT interpret it.
Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS: ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or 50 years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file the same motions and follow the same procedures in using the same Unconstitutional "lawyer system". In probate, the lawyers place themselves in everyone's will and estate. When there are minor children as heirs, the lawyer-judges appoint a lawyer (a child molesting Fagin) for EACH CHILD and, at times, the lawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate.
An OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX "MONEY" is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY LAWYERS. Money that is budgeted to County Boards, School Boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL of these agencies are "TRICKED" and "FORCED" into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION.
From: "evans"
To: secretary@sos.state.tx.us
Subject: Complaint
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 06:32:26
Dear Mr. Roger Williams
Secretary of State
city of Austin seat of Texas government
I have a complaint and want to bring criminal charges against some attorneys and commercial agents for rights violations. It is mandated by law that all crimes must be tried by common law in Texas.
There are supposed to be courts in every county of Texas that I can petition for redress. There are only COURTS presided over by other attorneys in the counties of Texas. There is no way for one of the people to get any kind of fair hearing in the attorney's Courts in Texas.
I am herein giving you notice as the Governors appointee of these facts. You need to notify the Governor immediately so he can find remedy in this matter. The Governor has the responsibility for seeing that the laws of Texas are enforced. The law mandates that all courts be open. You have the responsibility for publishing the laws of Texas.
Now unless you can come up with some law or other lawful reason I can be denied access to the court for redress, You or the Governor shall give me notice of the reason within five days or the Governor is to give me notice of the location of the court that has competent jurisdiction to hear my complaint.
Ralph
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted April 29, 2005]
The following letter, e-mail was not written by Ken but it
was sent to the Governor and sos.state.tx.us by Ken.
It has been added to the Class CD under Behind the Scenes
and added to the Website: http://wtpcc.freeservers.com/
"Carolyn Prince" <CPrince@sos.state.tx.us>,
"Robert Sumners" <RSumners@sos.state.tx.us>
From: "evans"
TO SOS AND GOVERNOR OF TEXAS
Refusal To Record
WHEN A COUNTY CLERK, RECORDER OF DEEDS, ETC
"REFUSES? TO RECORD": by David De Reimer
Most legal remedies for misconduct or crimes committed by government officials must be formally presented and officially "sanctioned" by the courts. Inevitably, the cast of litigation and the courts' inherent reluctance to favor private citizens who sue the government teach us that we "can't sue city hall" - - even if the folks -who work there are crooks.
Shielded by the official and practical immunities inherent in our legal system, government officials are encouraged to believe they are "above the law", beyond the reach of common people, and free to abuse their powers. No longer accountable in court, the frequency of official misconduct, oppression, and injustice is rising but unpunished.
As we've shown in the previous essays in (his study guide, commercial liens seem to have extraordinary power for attacking government officials who break the Law. The key to the liens' power is found in the fact that these liens are applied non-judicially - - without the knowledge, approval, or interference of a judge. Because the judges aren't involved, they can't stop you from filing your liens and therefore, they can't shield the government.
Instead, to file a commercial lien, you prepare the necessary documents and simply file them (along with a modest filing fee) with the local county clerk, recorder of deeds, etc. or whatever county agency is responsible for filing public documents.
But problems are beginning to develop. Since the legal system can’t stop these liens with high legal fees and biased judges, the county clerks are beginning to restrict the filing of liens. I.e., you prepare your lien, round up your $50 filing fee, and present yourself, your money, and your lien to the county clerk, and he refuses to accept the lien. The lien can't work if it's not filed, so a recalcitrant clerk can stop your lien cold. Although the clerk's refusal to file the lien documents is almost certainly unlawful. I've heard reports that "refusals to file" are increasingly common in California, Ohio, and other states.
The following is one man's recommendations for dealing with county clerks who refuse to file your liens (or other documents). This procedure is primarily based on the Uniform Commercial Code. Because several of the steps require you to wait patiently (30 days or more) for the government's response, the total process may take six months or more to complete.
These lengthy delays are difficult for those of us who are used to a diet of instant TV, microwave food, and fast gratification, to accept. Which is to say, here's another obstacle - time - our legal system uses to prevent the People from compelling government officials to obey the Law.
So be it. But what does it lake to overcome this obstacle? Just patience, persistence, and determination. The first one, two, or even three individuals who fight to compel the clerks to properly record their liens may have to struggle for most of a year. However, once the clerks begin to see their personal liability, they'll return to obeying the law and recording the liens. It may take time, but it's clearly time that must be spent by a handful of people to open the doors for the rest of the public.
In general, it looks as If the liens can be used to compel the judges and public officials to obey the law, and the Uniform Commercial Code can be used to compel the clerks to obey the law. Point: where there's a will, there's a legal remedy.
Advice: Learn to work with others. Your witnesses are your friends, advisors, and legal "safety net". Unless you have absolutely no choice, don’t try to "lien on" government officials all by yourself. Bring at least two witnesses along to every face-to-face meeting with the clerk, Recorder of Deeds, Sheriff, etc. After the meeting, have your witnesses prepare sworn affidavits of whatever they saw and heard the clerk, official, sheriff, say, do, etc. If the clerk refuses to file your lien and you have no witnesses, it's really just your word against his. And if the clerk refuses to provide a written explanation for his refusal, it's still your word against his.
However, if you bring witnesses, the officials will be more intimidated and less likely to refuse your lawful Demands in the first place. It may take a little persuasion, but if the clerks begin to suspect they are being "trapped" into a potentially litigious situation, they'll be more likely to cooperate and file your lien or calf their boss (and thereby generate more witnesses and more public controversy). If the clerks, officials, etc, still refuse to do their sworn duty, your witnesses and their affidavits will provide a solid foundation for pursuing stronger legal remedies.
Finally, as is always the case with instructions, forms, etc, presented in the AntiShyster, bear in mind that the following recommendations were not provided by a licensed lawyer, or "sanctified" by some Judge. What follows is only a study guide intended to outline one man's notion on how to compel government officials to do their sworn or lawful duty. Before you apply any or all of these recommendations, you must do the necessary research to confirm the strategy is valid and can be lawfully applied to your local county clerk, recorder of deeds. Sheriff, etc. - Editor
When a county clerk, recorder of deeds, etc. "refuses to record":
1. Get a written explanation, reason or "excuse" from cleric who refuses to record your document. This it the First link in your "chain of evidence".
2. As per your state Uniform Commercial Code section 3-505/501, send a "Notice And Demand For Exhibition Or Presentment Without Dishonor" by certified mail to the office (county clerk, recorder of deeds, etc) that refused to accept your lien. In that "Notice and Demand", demand that they produce for your inspection:
a) The Statute or Law passed by the Legislature which authorizes them to condemn the "Public" records for their personal and private use;
b) Their personal Bar/ Lawyer I.D. Number issued by the State Bar or State Supreme Court which authorizes them to make "Legal Determinations"; and,
c) The Statute of Law passed by the Legislature which authorizes them to edit and/or censor documents prior to recording.
Give them reasonable time (30 days) to comply with your DEMAND to prove written authority, and then put them ON NOTICE that the "Law of Principal and Agent" specifies that "The Agent is personally liable for acts not authorized by the Principal." As such, unless there are laws granting the clerk the power to refuse to record certain documents, the clerk/agent has no corporate veil of immunity for his refusals and may be personally vulnerable to a lawsuit.
3. If after the reasonable time has elapsed, and they have failed to produce the written "authority" you Demanded, send a Notice Of Default by certified mail, notifying them that they have defaulted by Not answering. In it, provide them with a "right to cure" their Default by recording your original lien (or other documents) without further interference, or suffer the consequences. Allow 10 to 30 days for their response.
4. If they don't respond in the 10 to 30 days, send them by certified mail, a "Notice of Amount Due" for the damage caused by their injury to you (or your Property Rights) by their defalcation, dereliction of duty, default, and unauthorized "Refusal to Record" in a "sizable amount" ($1,000??). Again, give them reasonable time (30 days) to pay you.
5. After the 30 days reasonable time has passed (plus 4 or 5 days for the mail), send them certified mail a "Final Notice of Amount Due" for the damage caused by their injury to you. Again, give them reasonable time (30 days) to pay you the amount of damages you've demanded.
6. If they don't pay your "Final Notice" Demand in 30 days (plus 4 or 5-days for the mail), go to the County Elected Peace Officer (Sheriff), present copies of the two certified mail Demands for payment, sign a "Distress Warrant" or "Distraint Warrant" stating that you have NOT been paid, and have the Sheriff go get your money or sell the clerk's car, mobile home, boat-motor-trailer, or whatever, to get your money for you (just like the "Consumer Finance" lenders and the IRS do).
7. At any stage of this "procedure", you can send the offending clerk(s) a letter and "offer to settle" ("Right to Cure Default") if they will "perform their sworn duty" and "Record without debate" your document or lien. If they fail or refuse, go on to the next step in the procedure. The purpose of this procedure is to force them to do what they are paid to do, not to sell their car, boat, whatever. Even after the sheriff takes some of their property, you might still offer to give them back their car (or whatever) if they will "Record your document without further question. This is to show "Good Faith".
8. If the Sheriff refuses to perform his Sworn Duty to execute upon your "Distraint Warrant", inform him that you personally will perform his sworn duty FOR HIM, and on his behalf. Inform him, also, that the newspapers will be informed that he has refused to perform his own sworn duty but continues to cash his pay check, and that this constitutes FRAUD by him since he only performs "Selective Enforcement" of the law - which is unlawful. Inform him that the resultant publicity may have a negative impact on his chances for running for reelection, and that you may have to sue him in his personal capacity for money damages due to his Dereliction of Duty, Defalcation, Embezzlement of Public Funds, and damage due to his injury to you and/or your property rights.
9. Send the Sheriff by certified mail a "Notice and Demand for Production or Exhibition Without Dishonor" of the Law or statute that authorizes him to:
a) perform "selective enforcement" of the Law;
b) accept the People's pay and not execute on lawful Warrants;
c) personally edit and censor documents, or refuse to perform his duty under his sworn oath (which is PERJURY).
10. If either the Sheriff or the Recorder of Deeds says that they take their "orders" from some government lawyer, get that in writing. This "Admission/ Confession" becomes the Second link in the "Chain of Evidence" or the "Preponderance of Evidence" that you will be creating. After, and only after, you have the above "Admission and Confession" in writing, leave their office. (Alternatively, you might bring one or two witnesses with you who will later provide affidavits describing what the Sheriff or Recorder said.)
Then perform the previous certified mail step # 2 and add item:
d) provide the Statute of Law passed by the Legislature that authorizes them to relinquish their office over to another (whoever - regardless of whether they're government attorneys or not) while continuing to accept and negotiate (cash) their pay check after having turned over their office to said "other".
Remember, you are exposing a HUMONGOUS scam. The lawyers' club has usurped the government from the Legislature and from the People, and you are exposing this fact. Do not expect Satan to give up easy and go home. He and his minions never have before, so why expect them to now? They are all part of the "New World Order" and they are the "Politburo" of the party. They truly believe that they are the "chosen few" to dictate the lives of the "Sheeple" on behalf of the World, Corporate, "Money Mafia" Bankers.
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted May 10, 2005]
To:
Robert Sumners RSumners@sos.state.tx.us ;
Carolyn Prince CPrince@sos.state.tx.us;
bhanson@sos.state.tx.us
From: evans
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 3:17 PM
Subject: THE STATE OF TEXAS
Mr. Secretary
I still want to know who this entity claiming to be THE STATE OF TEXAS that a group of attorneys are using to steal from me IS. Who does your records shows that accepts process for the entity. It is not the State of Texas that much I know. Do I have to request the navy for assistance for answer from you? They are also claiming I owe some sort of tax but its attorneys refuse to disclose to me what they are taxing and what they want to be paid with.
Ralph-Kenneth and not the corporate vessel RALPH KENNETH EVANS
To: "Carolyn Prince" CPrince@sos.state.tx.us
From: "evans
Subject: FOIA
Tue, 10 May 2005 14:54:31
Navy's FOIA Manager
Doris M. Lama
Chief of Naval Operations (DNS-36)
2000 Navy Pentagon
Washington, DC 20350-2000
Phone: (202) 685-6545
Fax: (202) 685-6580
Email: foia@mail.navy.mil
Federal Express Packages should be addressed to:
Chief of Naval Operations (DNS-36)
Room 135, Building 36
720 Kennon Street SE
Washington Navy Yard, DC 20374-5029.
Mrs. Lama processes requests for the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV) and SECNAV staff offices, the Assistant Secretaries of the Navy, Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) and CNO staff offices, General Counsel of the Navy, and the Naval Historical Center. She sets FOIA policy for the Department of the Navy, handles FOIA oversight complaints, authors SECNAVINST 5720.42F, Department of the Navy Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Program, conducts specialized training, and answers questions related to FOIA.
To: foia@mail.navy.mil
From: "evans
Subject: FOIA
Tue, 10 May 2005 14:52:45
Doris M. Lama
Dear Doris
I respectively request that you disclose to me does the navy still have a duty to protect the people of Texas from foreign agent that are using the courts to steal the liberty, life and property from the people of Texas for their (the agents) own self enrichment using fraudulent commercial papers and fraudulent commercial process in violation of the Texas rule of court procedures.
Respectively requested by me addressee Ralph-kenneth family of Evans
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted May 12, 2005]
To:
"Carolyn Prince" <CPrince@sos.state.tx.us>,
"Robert Sumners" <RSumners@sos.state.tx.us>
CC:
foia@mail.navy.mil
From: "evans"
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 18:31:11
Subject: Petition for help in restoring law
Notice to the Governor through and by notice to the Secretary of State for Texas
The rule of law no longer exist in Texas.
Terrorism rules supreme by the Bar Card Attorneys in the Courts and on the benches.
The attorneys, the clerks, judges in the Courts the sheriffs and policy enforcement officers aka police have and are running fraudulent commercial process using fraudulent commercial process in direct violation of Texas Court rule of civil procedure 15, their oath Article 16 of the 1876 Texas Constitution and the Texas “Bill of Rights”.
You have been given notice after notice of the fact that the above agents are running bogus process using bogus papers in the name of some bogus entity known as THE STATE OF TEXAS whom no one seems to know if it exist or who is the agent that is appointed for receipt of process for it. Therefore it is evidence it is a terrorist cult run out of the SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS by license from the meddle temple Bar in the city of London a foreign entity operating upon the soil of Texas and against the people of Texas. Denying the people the right to even petition for redress in any court in Texas.
Agents of the entity acting in the name of this entity in violates of the rule of law of the Courts of the State of Texas are murdering, stealing, robbing and taking the life, liberty and property of the people within the land of Texas for their own self enrichment in violation of the laws of Texas, the laws of the several united States of America and in violation of Treaties made pursuant to international law.
I am again giving you notice that the rule of law pursuant to the rules of court of 1911 is still enforce and effect pursuant to Texas Rules of Civil 2 of 1941. The rule of law has been denied to the people of Texas by agents of the Texas Bar Association in favor of their own and those that aid them self enrichment.
When the law and the civil authority fail in their duty to the people it is the sworn duty of the military to step in and restore law and order for the people.
There are numbers of the people that will produce proof evidence, give testimony in case after in the Texas courts that the rule of law and due process has been denied them in favor of the attorneys and their aids self enrichment. The Bar Terrorist have used their control of the law for closing the people county Courts of record that is mandated to be open by law that would have protected them the people from this criminal racketeering cult.
Pursuant to the contract with the United States the navy is being petitioned to help the people restore the rule of law in Texas.
Ralph-kenneth family of Evans this date May 11, 2005
Cc Navy headquarters City of Washington
Behind the Scenes Answer Please July 3, 2005
To: Robert Sumners RSumners@sos.state.tx.us; Carolyn Prince CPrince@sos.state.tx.us
From: evans
Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2005 7:33 PM
Subject: SECOND Request for Information
To: secretary of State for Texas and Governor of Texas
Notice to Agent is note to the Principal applies to the notice.
The Secretary and Governor both are herein Noticed.
I have received another document (copy attached) from some agent claiming it is on the behalf of the religious Satanic cult known as the STATE OF TEXAS again attempting to collect a tribute in violation of the rule of law see T.R.C.P. two (2) therefore I request the following;
1. Who is this entity who is claiming to be THE STATE OF TEXAS?
2. Where does it's authority come from to allow it to violates the rule of law of the State of Texas?
3. Who accepts lawful process for this entity THE STATE OF TEXAS?
4. Do you Secretary of State of Texas accept process for the entity claiming to be THE STATE OF TEXAS and who claims to be acting for the State of Texas?
5. Governor Perry I want to bring sue against this entity THE STATE OF TEXAS so disclose to me where is the Art 5 Section 15 court of record is located for the people of the county of Dallas as mandated by the Texas Constitution?
6. If no such court exist what are your plans to see that it does, seeing it is mandated by law to exist.
Ralph, family of Evans without any legal disabilities.
ATTACHMENT
From: "evans" <evansr@joimail.com>
To:
Robert Sumners RSumners@sos.state.tx.us ,
Carolyn Prince CPrince@sos.state.tx.us
Subject: Who or what is THE STATE OF TEXAS
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 05:58:05 -0600
To: Secretary of State of Texas
Who or what is THE STATE OF TEXAS? ANSWER PLEASE!
"Silence can be equated with fraud where there is a legal or moral duty to speak or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading. . . We cannot condone this shocking behavior by the IRS. Our revenue system is based on the good faith of the taxpayer and the taxpayers should be able to expect the same from the government in its enforcement and collection activities."
U.S. v. Tweel, 550 F.2d 297, 299.
See also U.S. v. Prudden, 424 F.2d 1021, 1032; Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932.
Behind the Scenes Answer Please July 22, 2005
To: Secretary of State for Texas and Governor for Texas
Mr. Secretary
Do your records show any Article 5 Section 15 court mandated by law the constitution for Texas open and doing business in Texas? The State of Texas Statutory Court do not have jurisdiction to hear my petitions. (See Attached Writ issued which I hold a certified copy). I and my property has been damage. I stand in want of a court for restitution for the damage to me and my property. The county Courts of records have been closed in violation of the Constitution and international law. The law of Nations requires that ever Nation adhere to their Constitution. With the county Courts of Record being unlawfully closed I stand without a Court for redress of grievances. That is a human rights violation which is protected by both the Texas Constitution and the human right treaty. I need to know from you or the Governor where I can get redress if not from the county Court of record.
Ralph family of Evans July 22, 2005
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted July 31, 2005]
From: "evans"
To: "Carolyn Prince" <CPrince@sos.state.tx.us>
Subject: Another request for information
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 18:27:05 -0600
To: the Secretary of State and the Governor for Texas
Dear Secretary and Governor
Again I ask for information as to THE STATE OF TEXAS and ROCKWALL COUNTY both have made a claim against my private copyrighted property by suit in the J.P. COURT PRECINCT TWO ROCKWALL COUNTY. I need the name and address of the agent that accepts legal process for the two above entities for a counter suit per our contract for use of my copyright private property as recorded in the county records of deeds in the county of Dallas that spells out the terms and condition of the use of said copyright. Supply me this information immediately.
Ralph-kenneth family of Evans owner of the copyright for a recipe for a Ham sandwich titled RALPH EVANS and is my private copyright property.
Served to the office of the Secretary State of Texas this 31st day of July 2005 by electronic mail by me Ralph-kenneth family of Evans
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted August 1, 2005]
From: evans
To: Robert Sumners
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 7:58 PM
Subject: Entrapped by their Own Ignorance Part Three .
Notice to the Secretary of state of Texas
That is, the individual must state his or her will or choice and the law will uphold that individual choice to make public policy toward him of no effect. HJR 192 is an Act that is open ended. That is, you can participate in the public policy that HJR 192 established or you can decline to participate.
I ralph-kenneth evans have so stated I decline to participate you will find a copy recorded in the records of the county of Dallas the Supreme Court of Texas did and the Court issued the discharge as require by law. I have not reinlisted.
Now Mr. Secretary you and the governor need to honor that discharge and give notice to the Satanic agents operating out of the middle Temple BAR of the city of London in England a.k.a attorney. Priest for the Cult.
So subtle is this slavery that the citizens are entrapped by their own ignorance
This article is too large for one reading so it was decided to break it down into four mailings.
The next 3 sections are as follows;
Losing the Law
Private Money
Jurisdiction of the 14th Amendment
FOOTNOTES
Losing the Law
Between 1868 and 1933, the 14th Amendment had little affect upon the general population. This was because the people still controlled the substance of their law. That is, the only people affected by the 14th Amendment relation during this time were those that held licenses and contracts with the government of the United States or were in its employment. It was not until June 5, 1933 that the 14th Amendment took on a whole new power. On that date H.J.R. (House Joint Resolution) 192 was passed and the American people voluntarily gave up their Law because they voluntarily gave up their gold.
That is correct, the people voluntarily gave up their Law. To read the history just after that time and talk to people who lived through it, they will tell about the government agents who came around to confiscate the gold that was in the possession of the people. It appeared from what took place that the people were forced to give up their gold. However, that is not what could have happened. Going along with the "Public Policy" of HJR 192 was actually a voluntary act - "and is mutable at will."/ 60 Thus the individual was a victim of his own ignorance about the Law. By accepting the offer of the private credit, the population was automatically bound over to the private trust, now having gone public because the whole population was moved wholesale into the trust by their silent or negative acceptance. When 51% of the population volunteered for the private trust it became a Public Trust.
To understand issues that proceeded the 1933 event, we must go back to 1834 when the U.S. Supreme Court declared in Wheaton v. Peters/ 61 that there was no federal common law. In other words, the federal government was not set up under the common law as a "state in the Union," such as Pennsylvania, Virginia, New York , etc.. These states were based upon the substance of the common law and its allodial land titles. Allodial means there are no overlords upon the land, therefore, man is his own King upon the land. The gold and silver that came from the allodial land were public money used for private trade between the citizens of the states. This meant there were no third parties involved in the trading contracts because there was no private enterprise trust (as the 14th Amendment) dictating public policy. Trade among the states, at that time, involved two party contracts called free enterprise. The commercial trade taking place between the states was mostly in its infant stages and was regulated by the common law. Yet, the common law of each colony was foreign to each of the other colonies without any standard of trade. Most of the commercial (political commercial/ 62) trade involved international trade which was regulated under admiralty/maritime law outside constitutional mandates.
With the growth of commerce between the states, there became a need to try and standardize some form of commercial law. Each state had its own laws of commerce, as based on the common law, and this created great problems when it came to which state's laws were to be enforced when disputes arose. A federal circuit court judge, by the name of Joseph Story, was a pioneer in trying to form some sort of standard in commercial law that would appeal not only to the federal courts, but also to the state courts.
When Story was appointed to the supreme court of the united States he became the principle advocate in the landmark decision of Swift v. Tyson,/ 63 establishing a general federal (civil commercial/ 64) common law so as to create uniformity in commercial disputes involving negotiable instruments in federal and state courts. / 65 The decision was based, in part, on the fact that gold and silver coins, as the substance of the common law, were being transported between states in commerce. As a result of the substance of the common law being used in commerce, a jury trial was possible in the federal circuit courts. The court proceedings were strictly operated under authority of Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution.
Justice Story / 66 had been aware of Robert Owen's communal concepts in 1833 and the influence it could have on the loss of gold as a fixed standard in trade. Owen was instrumental in promoting ideas of how to move private communal commerce into the public sector. To accomplish this, the law would have to be changed in order to obtain the maximum financial stimulus for commercial growth. For a man like Story, who knew the relationship of gold to the Law, he could read the handwriting on the wall. With the undercurrent of corporate special interest scheming that started in 1833, Story knew that somewhere down the road the American people would lose their Law. He knew this would eventually allow private law (private law merchant) to be moved into the public sector controlling public policy, resulting in the loss of general (commercial) common law for those involved. In other words, separation of powers would be lost in favor of the private commercial corporate business to the detriment of the average citizen.
Also in the 1842 Swift v. Tyson decision, Justice Story would assure a trial by jury in a civil cause between states even if there was no gold standard in the future.
What does a jury have to do with the fixed gold standard? Gold was the land because it not only came from the land, but it was also transportable real estate (portable allodium). The ancient common law was based on the real property boundaries or soil that belonged to a person and anything that came from that ground or soil, such as gold or any other precious mineral or rock, was considered substance of the soil in the common law./ 67 Gold in the hands of the common person meant the public municipal law (Public Law merchant) was "supreme" because the person controlled the gold or land where the goods were produced. In the true historic sense of the common law, the only person who counted was the land owner. That is, you could be equivalent to a slave if you did not own land. Also, at the beginning of our country, one could not vote unless they owned land. In a jury trial, the jury had to be made up of the peers of the person on trial. The only true peer of a non-commercial individual land owner under the common law was another land owner. Land ownership being based on absolute rights with allodial titles - no outside private equitable interest or overseer involved.
Historically, the commercial traders and merchants were nomads. They were not land owners nor were they producers. What they made money on was trading in the commodities the land owners produced. In other words, they were the original broker middle men. When the fixed gold standard was removed, it meant that everyone had been shifted from the civil commerce (Public Law merchant) side of the law to the political commence (private law merchant) side of the law. Where once you were considered to control the land and the Law absolutely, now you are considered to be a non-producing trader with only relative equitable rights - land or no land. The result is that there is no more possibility of a trial to judge the public municipal law, rather the trial would be based on the facts of the private implied contract you were now assumed to be involved in. You are assumed to be guilty before proven innocent. It is the Roman civil law that makes you guilty by accusation requiring you to prove your innocence.
Swift v. Tyson has been in effect since 1842. However, the Erie Railroad v. Tompkins/ 68 decision of 1938 stated that there was no longer "general federal common law." The Erie Railroad case was based on the fact that it was assumed that all citizens in the United States have been included in contractual commerce of the private law merchant (through the 14th Amendment and HJR 192) outside the Constitution as allowed by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17. The Erie Railroad decision came five years after HJR 192 (the removal of the fixed gold standard ). This allowed enough time to pass so the when people realized that they had no right to a real jury trial, they would not panic. Erie Railroad was based on HJR 192 because the fixed standard ( the law or the gold) of money was removed.
It is now up to the individual which commerce he wants to be a part of, for it is a political choice. Do you want to be a part of the political commerce under the private law merchant of the 14th Amendment sustained by Erie Railroad v. Tompkins? Or do you want to have absolute liberty and all the absolute freedoms of civil commerce under the Public Law merchant as supported by Swift v. Tyson? Remember, the courts will not question your political choice but they must uphold it. However, unless you take the proper action, your choice will be assumed to be with the private law merchant.
With HJR 192, the substance of your law - gold - was turned into commodities. That is, the fixed standard, at $35.00 per troy ounce of weight and fineness of your money was removed. Once the money no longer had a fixed standard, it could then fluctuate according to supply and demand just like a commodity i.e., a bushel of grain. This had the same effect on real property as well - this is called inflation. Money is the only Thing in the United States that has no fixed standard.
Private Money
You can still function and contract within the money system of the Republic using the private money because Congress suspended the "Payment" of debt in Law by suspending the fixed gold standard. Even though one is outside the 14th Amendment trust, and not a part or beneficiary of the public policy of the trust, you cannot "Pay" your debts in Law. All you can do is "discharge" your debt in equity./ 69 Because of this, you are the only one who can determine your worth and values in money and other wise when not under the 14th Amendment.
Please note: the explanation of the money system in this section is for educational purposes only. It is never to be used in any legal arguments, because the choice of the money ( public or private) is a political question which the courts do not have jurisdiction to decide.
When the fixed gold standard was suspended in 1933 by HJR 192, it was not an abolishment of the standard or the law associated with it, it was just suspended. That is, it was set aside in favor of another law. It was a political decision based on the fact that the people did not rise up and tell Congress that you cannot take away our law or gold ( money). Therefore, the treasury agents came and confiscated the gold (being the Law) because the people did not choose to keep the Law. The individual could have stopped that from happening, but he would have had to have made his legal and political declaration to not be involved with private law for public purposes (democracy) under the 14th Amendment. Because the people were ignorant of what was taking place by operation of law under the 14th Amendment, no one knew how to expatriate back into the Republic Law that was still there.
The Erie Railroad decision saying there was no "general federal common law" was based on the fact that the man who sued the railroad was an outlaw to the Constitution. That is, he had no standing in absolute constitutional law because he was a 14th Amendment citizen and therefore he could not call on any general federal commercial common law that still existed in the Republic for protection. / 70 He had chosen, by the default of silence, the private law of the 14th Amendment trust for public purposes. He could not claim any rights based upon the Swift v. Tyson decision nor could he access Article III, Section 2 courts of "judicial Power." Instead, he could only be compelled to resort to Article I legislative courts that operate outside the U.S. Constitution.
The Constitution of the (u)nited States of America uses the term: "the several states." This means the territorial government and its Article I ecclesiastical or legislative courts. Under Article IV, Section 4, the Constitution uses the term "states in this union." "States in this union" is different from "the several states" as used in Article I of the Constitution. Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution guarantees the republican form of government. "States in this union" is referring to public municipal law of the Republican states for private purposes while "the several states" refers to private law for making public policy, i.e., trust law including the Uniform Commercial Code. / 71 Before 1933, you did not have to call on the republican form of government and Article III, Section 2 courts of "judicial Power" because it was automatically there because the gold was there. After 1933, you have to call on the ( public municipal law) for private purposes to have the republican form of government because the fixed gold standard is not there. Gold coin today is commodity gold (also called "fiat money" ) and that is why it fluctuates in value on the commodity market daily. It is not guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury as to its weight, fineness and fixed standard.
As to the 16th Amendment, it has not applied since 1933. Today, the 16th Amendment pertains only to the federated states as political subdivisions of the District of Columbia as well as American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, etc., and are construed as "(S)tates" of the United States; not to be confused with the 50 (s)tates of the (u)nion.
Remember that you are presumed to be a 14th Amendment citizen since 1933 unless you bring forth evidence to prove your political choice is otherwise. It is all a part of your express Will. Silence on your part means that you have conveyed your property to the public trust and want to be treated as a constructive trustee outside the Constitution. The IRS and the State Tax Boards are the trusters of your estate because of your silence. If you want to get back to the republican form of law, you have to use the state probate court to sever the trust relationship. Once the trust is broken by the courts noticing your Will in expatriation, you can take back your estate. The trusters received your trust by operation of law. You can only take it back by exercise of your private use of public municipal law. Also remember that the individual is presumed to know the law. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse.
Another very important reason for the courts having to sever the trust relationship is to protect the trust. If there was no judicial noticed action, there would be nothing to stop the individual from bringing suit against the trust to receive benefits from it even though they had never paid a dime in the form of taxes.
The founding fathers established a republican form of government right in the beginning. And what is unique about the (u)nited States being a Republic is that we had a Constitution to spell everything out about its operation in relationship to its Citizens. The Constitution of the (u)nited States of America was designed to protect the minority from the majority. All other republics fail mainly because they do not have an instrument that defines what the republic is and how it should operate.
Jurisdiction Of The 14th Amendment
From the beginning, federal district courts had no jurisdiction to deal with the private individual. They only handled admiralty- maritime issues. There were only circuit courts and the (s)upreme (c)ourt of the united States operating in the United States government that could have jurisdiction over matters involving diversity of citizenship. That is, matters involving citizens from different states. The state courts handled federal questions because they being courts of original jurisdiction in issues that involved contracts. When the 14th Amendment came along, the United States district courts could have jurisdiction in private matters of individuals involved in the trust because the trust and its members now came under admiralty-maritime law outside the Constitution as did all international trade. At that point, the federal courts were given "in rem" jurisdiction over the people. The "res" /72 was with the people, because there was no public debt. The "in personam" jurisdiction did not apply to the average citizen because the government had no direct contact with the people who lived in the states until after 1933. When the fixed gold standard was removed, the people lost their Law. Before 1933, the federal courts could not assume jurisdiction over a person. There had to be some bilateral arrangement (contact/conveyance establishing a res or "thing" ) that would have given the court jurisdiction over the people in personam.
All the changes from civilian methods result from these changes - the perverted use of "person" and the new concept of "res."/ 73
The "Law of persons and things" is the "law of Status." "Law of Things" is "Law of Property" - or contract. Any changes in an individual's standing in the law are a result of how he unknowingly allows a res to be formed and thereby becomes subject to another jurisdiction.
There is a difference between "subject matter jurisdiction" and "jurisdiction of the subject matter." The courts have jurisdiction of the subject matter of the trust res under the 14th Amendment. But as a non-14th Amendment citizen, there is no res to which they - the court - can attach jurisdiction. However, there are areas in the law whereby you can re-convey subject matter jurisdiction to the court.
Before 1933, the federal courts did not have in rem jurisdiction to compel performance of the general public because the people had not given up the law (gold). Unless there was some bilateral contract involved in a dispute, the federal courts could not attach jurisdiction over a person. The federal courts only dealt primarily in contractual disputes between citizens of different states. After 1933, the people contracted for more debts than there was gold to back up those debts. Something like $28 billion in debt with only $4 billion in gold to back it. When Congress suspended the gold standard, the nation was thrown into a debtor/creditor relationship because the people are the posterity of the country, they are also the posterity of the debt through the social security system while remaining under the 14th Amendment because it made one primarily a United States (c)itizen and secondarily a citizen of the state. So under the 14th Amendment, you automatically became responsible for servicing the national debt in order to maintain the social security system./ 74 [Review footnote 24 on constructive trusts].
The public debt then establishes a res in the District of Columbia and since you are primarily a United States (c)itizen under the 14th Amendment, you automatically become a beneficiary of the debt. The res is the debt as well as the subject matter. The public debt operates outside Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution of the United States. This is why the whole judicial system operates outside the Constitution in that they operate only under Article I as judicial functions. Every judge then can render decisions based on his own prejudices, not on constitutional law of the Republic. Since the 1938 Erie Railroad decision, justices have been free to render Article I ecclesiastical or legislative court decisions based on their own desires or political pressures, not on the Constitution, and they are immune from suit because it is a judicial function , not a "judicial Power" as Article III, Section 2 courts.
Under the 14th Amendment trust relation, the federal government, in dealings with its citizens, automatically has "in rem" jurisdiction over all 14th Amendment citizens (also called U.S. (c)itizens ). When the government has in rem jurisdiction, they automatically receive "in personam" jurisdiction at the same time.
"Jurisdiction in rem depends solely on the physical control of the res by the sovereign exercising jurisdiction [14th Amendment jurisdiction of the public charitable trust of D.C.] ... thus where property is carried into a foreign territory [ District of Columbia] without the cooperation of consent of the owner, jurisdiction cannot be exercised."/ 75 [Bracket information added]
General jurisdiction is public municipal law for private purposes, while local jurisdiction, also called "local laws," are private law for public purposes.
When a person expatriates using 15 Statute at Large, his or her whole estate comes back out of the trust. So the state, under "local law" (that is, Washington D.C. and its political subdivisions) loses the in rem jurisdiction and therefore automatically loses in personam jurisdiction. The court can compel you to appear, but cannot attach subject matter jurisdiction because the subject matter, or the trust res, is no longer in Washington D.C. or its political subdivisions. It has been removed back under the Republic by your political Will in fact, and in law.
HJR 192 is mutable by will./ 76 The insolvency of the government, as declared by suspension of the gold standard, is not something that everyone has to participate in. Not everyone has to be an "insolvent." The people put more demands on the payment of gold than there was gold in the treasury so the gold standard was suspended. But the individual does not have to go along with public policy, especially public policy that was a result of private law, viz., private law for public purposes.
Before June 5, 1933 , there was public money for private debts. After June 5th, there was private money for public debts. Now all private credit money operating in the public sector as public policy is all that has been available to discharge (not pay) private debts since June 5, 1933. The individual who is a non-14th Amendment citizen can technically maintain the "gold standard," because all the taxes of compelled performance do not apply to him. Inflation is due to taxes because the taxes support non - producers and thus a sounder dollar results when no taxes are paid.
Since June 5, 1933 , everything is predicated on your personal Will. Through public policy and the silence of the individual, it has been assumed that the individual wants to continue the trust relationship and therefore the individual must perform. Performing to the insolvency means that you must contribute to the insolvency. However, the individual does not have to stay bound to the debt of the public policy because it is "mutable by will." That is, the individual must state his or her will or choice and the law will uphold that individual choice to make public policy toward him of no effect. HJR 192 is an Act that is open ended. That is, you can participate in the public policy that HJR 192 established or you can decline to participate.
It must be understood that in order to make public policy mutable by the Will of the individual, very definite legal procedure must be exercised along with the proper statute law. The Statutes must be exercised with the proper legal procedure to accomplish "mutable by will" viz., state Probate Code, along with 15 Statute at Large published legal notice by Declaration. The Declaration is an express testamentary Will when it has been properly signed and witnessed and published.
Hanson v. Denckla / 77 deals with the 14th Amendment jurisdiction. The trust in dispute was a private trust set up according to public municipal law for private purposes in the state of Delaware without any third party relationship.
Prior to the 14th Amendment, an exercise of jurisdiction over person or property outside the foreign state was thought to be absolute nullity, but the matter remained a question of state law over which the court exercised no authority. With the adoption of the 14th Amendment, any judgment purporting to bind the person of the defendant over whom the court had not acquired in personam jurisdiction was void within the state as well as without. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714 Since the state is forbidden to enter a judgment attempting to bind a person over whom it has no jurisdiction, it has even less right to enter a judgment purporting the interest of such person and property over which the court has no jurisdiction. From Pennoyer v. Neff we come to the more flexible standard of International Shoe Co. v. State of Wash., 326 U.S. 310, but it is a mistake to assume that this trend heralds the eventual demise of all restriction on personal jurisdiction of state courts. Those restrictions are more than a guarantee of immunity from inconvenient or distant litigation. They are a consequence of territorial limitations on the power of the respective states. However minimal the burden of defending in a foreign tribunal a defendant may not be called on to do so unless he had minimal contacts with that state that are a prerequisite to its exercise of power over him. This means that Florida had no relationship or contract that tied back to the corpus of the trust in Delaware . Therefore, the 14th Amendment did not apply as to give Florida any jurisdiction. Even before passage of the 14th Amendment, the court of International Shoe Co. sustained the state courts in refusing full faith and credit to judgments entered by courts that were without jurisdiction over a non resident defendant. But it is essential in each case that there be some act by which the defendant purposely avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum state thus invoking the benefits and protection of its laws.
The "forum state," in the case of the non-14th Amendment citizen, is the corporate municipal city of Washington, D.C.."Full faith and credit" means that we will recognize your laws if you will recognize our laws. So in this particular case, the U.S. (S)upreme (C)ourt was saying that Florida had no legal direct tie to the corpus or body of the trust and therefore they had no full faith and credit under the 14th Amendment to give jurisdiction to act on. The U.S. (S)upreme (C)ourt based their decision on the ruling of the Delaware Supreme Court who had ruled on the corpus of the trust and what the intent of the settler (the person who made the trust) was.
In other words, the 14th Amendment can work in the favor of non-14th Amendment persons because it brings a dividing line down between the Public Laws and the private laws.
FOOTNOTES
60 .
Funk v U.S., 290 U.S. 371 (1933)
61 .
Wheaton v. Peters, 8 Pet. 591
62 .
Political Commerce is also referred to as the "Private Law Merchant."
63 .
Swift v. Tyson, 16 Peters 1 (1842).
64 .
Civil Commerce is also referred to as "Public Law Merchant."
65 .
Clearfield Trust v. United States , 318 U.S. 363, 63 S.Ct. 573.
66 .
There were many influential Americans who were interested in Owen's "New View of Society." Among those were Chancellor James Kent who wrote Commentaries on American Law. Jonathan Mayhew Wainwright, Bishop of Grace Church of New York, John McVickar of Columbia University, David Golden former Mayor of New York City, Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story. All had talks with Owen on his communatarian ideas. Later Owen was granted the Hall of Representatives in the Capitol for presenting his ideas. First time by Henry Clay the speaker, and second by President John Quincy Adams, Ex-President James Monroe, members of the cabinet, the Supreme Court and the Congress.
67 .
The common law, as referred to here, had to do with the body of those principles and rules of action, relating to the government and security of persons and property, which derive their authority solely from usages and customs of immemorial antiquity or from the judgments and decrees of the courts recognizing, affirming, and enforcing such usages and customs, and in this sense, particularly the ancient unwritten law of England. 15A C.J.S.
68 .
Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. at 64 (1938).
69 .
Stanek v. White, 172 Minn. 390, 215 N.W. 784.
70 .
Clearfield Trust v. United States , 318 U.S. 363, 63 S.Ct. 573.
71 .
See Public Law 88-243-244, 77 Stat. 630-775, 88th Congress, 1st Session, December 30, 1963 .
72 .
Res Lat. The subject matter of a trust or Will. In civil law, a thing; an object. As a term of the law, this word has a very wide and extensive signification, including not only things which are objects of property, but also such as are not capable of individual ownership. By res, according to the modern civilians, is meant everything that may form an object of rights, in opposition to persona, which is regarded as a subject of rights. It is everything that may form an object of rights and includes an object, subject-matter or status. In re Riggle's Will, 11 A.D.2d 51, 205 N.Y.S.2d 19-22.
73 .
American Law And Procedure, page 186.
74 .
This includes all the debt of bankruptcy that takes place in this country. As this treatise was receiving last minute changes, the national news broadcast the story of the largest corporate bankruptcy that has ever been filed. The company is Olympia and York. They have an estimated debt of 18 billion dollars. All the 14th Amendment citizens are going to have the privilege of helping cover the part of the 18 billion that effects the public social trust.
75 .
"The Exercise Of Jurisdiction In Rem To Compel Payment Of Debt." , Harvard Law Review, Vol. XXVII., No. 2., December, 1913.
76 .
"Public Policy" mutable by will as spoken of in Funk v. United States, 290 U.S. 371.
77 .
Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235 (1958).
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted August 3, 2005]
This should conclude any business you may have believed you had with me and (no WAS REMOVED) further contact between you and I is not necessary.
From Ralph-Kenneth family of Evans August 2, 2005
Mailing location certain and exact; notary Public 3352 Broadway Blvd. # 406 Garland, Texas
To Clerk Debbie Perez
It has come to my attention you may have attempted to send me something in the mail to an old mailing location. The above mailing location is exact and certain and is the proper location.
I also want to inform you that I am not a resident or a US citizen pursuant to your code and as such the entities known as ROCKWALL COUNTY, THE STATE OF TEXAS and UNITED STATE which I believe to be Satanic religious associations have no jurisdiction to contact me in any matter.
I further believe that the above name associations are operated out of the middle Temple located in the city of London in a foreign jurisdiction known as England by the middle Temple BAR agents known in Texas as attorneys. .
Therefore I give notice to all parties that I am not a member of your religious association which I believe to be a Satanic Cult. If you are soliciting an honorary gift I can not participate in any evil thing because of my sincere held religious beliefs and training.
This should conclude any business you may have believed you had with me and no further contact between you and I is not necessary.
All the documents needed in support of my possession you will find attached.
Respectively Ralph
THE LAW IS THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION
IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS
And the Laws says:
Article 1 Sec. 8. FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND PRESS; LIBEL. Every person shall be at liberty to speak, write or publish his opinions on any subject, being responsible for the abuse of that privilege; and no law shall ever be passed curtailing the liberty of speech or of the press. In prosecutions for the publication of papers, investigating the conduct of officers, or men in public capacity, or when the matter published is proper for public information, the truth thereof may be given in evidence. And in all indictments for libels, the jury shall have the right to determine the law and the facts, under the direction of the court, as in other cases.
Article 1 Sec. 13. EXCESSIVE BAIL OR FINES; CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT; REMEDY BY DUE COURSE OF LAW. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel or unusual punishment inflicted. All courts shall be open, and every person for an injury done him, in his lands, goods, person or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law.
Sec. 15. RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY. The right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate. The Legislature shall pass such laws as may be needed to regulate the same, and to maintain its purity and efficiency. Provided, that the Legislature may provide for the temporary commitment, for observation
and/or treatment, of mentally ill persons not charged with a criminal offense, for a period of time not to exceed ninety (90) days, by order of the County Court without the necessity of a trial by jury. (NOTE READER IT DOES NOT SAY DISTRICT COURT OR COUNTY COURT AT LAW)
The Texas Constitution
Article 5 - JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Section 13 - NUMBER OF GRAND AND PETIT JURORS; NUMBER CONCURRING
Grand and petit juries in the District Courts shall be composed of twelve persons, except that petit juries in a criminal case below the grade of felony shall be composed of six persons; but nine members of a grand jury shall be a quorum to transact business and present bills. In trials of civil cases [(below the grade of felony has been remove) unlawfully by a gang of criminals the bar card attorneys in violation of the ‘Bill of Right] in the District Courts, nine members of the jury, concurring, may render a verdict, but when the verdict shall be rendered by less than the whole number, it shall be signed by every member of the jury concurring in it. When, pending the trial of any case, one or more jurors not exceeding three, may die, or be disabled from sitting, the remainder of the jury shall have the power to render the verdict; provided, that the Legislature may change or modify the rule authorizing less than the whole number of the jury to render a verdict.
(Amended Nov. 6, 2001, and Sept. 13, 2003.)
Article 5 Sec. 15. COUNTY COURT; COUNTY JUDGE. There shall be established in each county in this State a County Court, which shall be a court of record; and there shall be elected in each county, by the qualified voters, a County Judge, who shall be well informed in the law of the State; shall be a conservator of the peace, and shall hold his office for four years, and until his successor shall be elected and qualified. He shall receive as compensation for his services such fees and perquisites as may be prescribed by law. (Amended Nov. 2, 1954.)
Sec. 16. COUNTY COURTS; JURISDICTION; DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGE. The County Court has jurisdiction as provided by law. NOTE JURISDICTION OF ARTICLE 1)
The County Judge is the presiding officer of the County Court and has judicial functions as provided by law. County court judges shall have the power to issue writs necessary to enforce their jurisdiction. County Courts in existence on the effective date of this amendment are continued unless otherwise provided by law.
When the judge of the County Court is disqualified in any case pending in the County Court the parties interested may, by consent, appoint a proper person to try said case, (NOTE THE PEOPLE CAN APPOINT THEIR JUDGE) or upon their failing to do so a competent person may be appointed to try the same in the county where it is pending in such manner as may be prescribed by law. (THE GOVERNOR MUSH APPOINT A JUDGE) (Amended Aug. 11, 1891, Nov. 7, 1978, Nov. 4, 1980, and Nov. 5, 1985.)
Sec. 16a. (Repealed Nov. 5, 1985.)
Sec. 17. TERMS OF COUNTY COURT; PROSECUTIONS; JURIES. The County Court shall hold terms as provided by law. Prosecutions may be commenced in said court by information filed by the county attorney, or by affidavit, (YOUR AFFIDAVIT) as may be provided by law. Grand juries empaneled in the District Courts shall inquire into misdemeanors, (NOTE ONLY FINE NO JAIL TIME) and all indictments therefor returned into the District Courts shall forthwith be certified to the County Courts or other inferior courts,(NOTE AGAIN FINE ONLY NO JAIL TIME IN THE INFERIOR) having jurisdiction to try them for trial; and if such indictment be quashed in the County, or other inferior court, the person charged, shall not be discharged if there is probable cause of guilt, but may be held by such court or magistrate to answer an information or affidavit. A jury in the County Court shall consist of six men; but no jury shall be empaneled to try a civil case unless demanded by one of the parties, who shall pay such jury fee therefor, in advance, as may be prescribed by law, unless he makes affidavit that he is unable to pay the same. (Amended Nov. 5, 1985.)
Article 5 - JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Section 29 - COUNTY COURT; TERMS OF COURT; PROBATE BUSINESS; COMMENCEMENT OF PROSECUTIONS; JURY
The County Court shall hold at least four terms for both civil and criminal business annually, as may be provided by the Legislature, or by the Commissioners Court of the county under authority of law, and such other terms each year as may be fixed by the Commissioners Court; provided, the Commissioners Court of any county having fixed the times and number of terms of the County Court, shall not change the same again until the expiration of one year. Said court shall dispose of probate business either in term time or vacation, under such regulation as may be prescribed by law. Until otherwise provided, the terms of the County Court shall be held on the first Mondays in February, May, August and November, and may remain in session three weeks. (Added Aug. 14, 1883; amended Nov. 6, 2001.)
The Texas Constitution
Article 4 - EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
Section 7 - COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF OF MILITARY FORCES; CALLING FORTH MILITIA
He shall be Commander-in-Chief of the military forces of the State, except when they are called into actual service of the United States. He shall have power to call forth the militia to execute the laws of the State, to suppress insurrections, and to repel invasions. (Amended Nov. 2, 1999.)
The Texas Constitution
Article 4 - EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
Section 21 - SECRETARY OF STATE
There shall be a Secretary of State, who shall be appointed by the Governor, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, and who shall continue in office during the term of service of the Governor. He shall authenticate the publication of the laws, and keep a fair register of all official acts and proceedings of the Governor, and shall, when required, lay the same and all papers, minutes and vouchers relative thereto, before the Legislature, or either House thereof, and shall perform such other duties as may be required of him by law. He shall receive for his services an annual salary in an amount to be fixed by the Legislature. (Amended Nov. 3, 1936, and Nov. 2, 1954.)
NOTE THIS IS THE LAW AND IT CAN’T BE CHANGED EXCEPT BY SOVEREIGNS. NOT BY THE LEGISLATORS, THE GOVERNOR, THE BAR CARD ATTORNEYS, THE STATE COURTS OR EMPLOYEES AND WARDS OF THE STATE. BUT IT HAS BEEN CHANGED UNLAWFULLY BY INSURRECTION AND INVASION BY BRITISH ESQUIRES OPERATING A RELIGIOUS SATANIC CULT OUT OF THE MIDDLE TEMPLE IN THE CITY OF LONDON WITHIN THE NATION OF ENGLAND.
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted August 10, 2005]
From: "evans" < evansr@joimail.com>
To: "Robert Sumners" <RSumners@sos.state.tx.us >,
"Carolyn Prince" <CPrince@sos.state.tx.us>
Subject: Notice
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:06:47 -0600
To: the Governor of the State of Texas and THE STATE OF TEXAS a unincorp. British association by notice to the secretary of State and STATE.
The British Esquires (Known in Texas as attorn-eys) have declared war upon on me and my private property. This war is regular and on going.
Verified Statement of Facts by Declaration in the
Nature of an Affidavit by Ralph: family of Evans
Pursuant to and under original jurisdiction by law the law of the land of Texas
Commerce operates in truth; demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure.
To: Whom it may concern:
I, me, the undersigned, one of We the People, Sovereign, natural born living souls, the Posterity, born upon the land in one of several counties as a non-resident within the one of the several States united of America, Creditor, Claimant, and Secured party, hereinafter "Secured party, and creditor, I, me, do hereby solemnly declare, say and state:
I, me the Secured Party, am competent to state the matters set forth herewith.
I, me, Creditor and Claimant am competent to state the matters set forth herewith.
I, Me, the Secured Party have personal knowledge of the Fact stated herein.
I, me, Creditor and Claimant have personal knowledge of the Facts stated herein.
All the Facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and not misleading, admissible as evidence and if testifying, I, me, Secured Party and Claimant shall so state.
Plain Statement of Facts
Fact: Within the last sixty days I visited the permit sewage department with funds to pay the tax for a permit for Michael Lindsey per his request before he would agree to install a septic system for me on 5 plus acres adjoining, Dowell Road within the county of Rockwall within Texas.
Fact: I was told by the people at the permit department that I would have to get a 911 address for my land before they would issue a permit. I believe from much study of the codes the effect of such act would assign my private land over to the public district with a copyright zip code. I believe this would place my land under public policy of an unincorporated association a Satanic Religious Cult known as ROCKWALL COUNTY operated out of the middle Temple located in the city of London within England and I would lose ownership and retain only the right to use said land under the supervision of the COMMISSIONERS of the Religious Cult ROCKWALL COUNTY.
Fact: Under the laws of the God of Heaven I was unable to forfeit the protection of my Father in Heaven pursuant to Second Corinthians Chapter 6: 14-18 by signing an agreement with the Satanic Cult known as ROCKWALL COUNTY and STATE OF TEXAS .
Fact: Michael Lindsey refused to install the septic system per the engineer's recommended plan because the permit failed to be issued by the members of the cult.
Fact: Michael Lindsey did agree to rent me his backhoe and agree to call in the requirement for the tank to be delivered to me.
Fact The tank was delivered to me by a Mexican National under the free trade agreement.
Fact: All parties were paid in satanic script unredeemable Federal Reserve notes there being no lawful money in circulation to conduct private trade.
Fact: ROCKWALL COUNTY and THE STATE OF TEXAS are not the same entities as the county of Rockwall and the State of Texas.
Fact: agents and members the satanic cult's ROCKWALL COUNTY and STATE OF TEXAS are running fraudulent commercial process using fraudulent commercial paper in violation of T.R.C.P. two.
Executed pursuant to the laws of the united States of America title 28 USCA 1746 (1) and the Holy law James 5: 12 this eight day of August, A.D. two thousand and five by me,
Ralph
__________________________
From Ralph-Kenneth family of Evans August 2, 2005
Mailing location certain and exact; notary Public 3352 Broadway Blvd. # 406 Garland, Texas
To Clerk Debbie Perez
It has cone to my attention you may have attempted to send me something in the mail to an old mailing location. The above mailing location is exact and certain is the proper location.
I also want to inform you that I am not a resident or a US citizen pursuant to your code and as such the entities known as ROCKWALL COUNTY, THE STATE OF TEXAS and UNITED STATE which I believe to be Satanic religious associations have no jurisdiction to contact me in any matter.
I further believe that the above name associations are operated out of the middle Temple located in the city of London in a foreign jurisdiction known as England by the middle Temple BAR agents known in Texas as attorneys. .
Therefore I give notice to all parties that I am not a member of your religious association which I believe to be a Satanic Cult. If you are soliciting a honorary gift I can not participate in any evil thing because of my sincere held religious beliefs and training.
This should conclude any business you may have believed you had with me and no further contact between you and I is not necessary.
All the documents needed in support of my possession you will find attached.
Respectively
Ralph
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted August 16, 2005]
Murder
"evans" <evans@basicisp.net
To: "Joe Pojman" <joe@texasallianceforlife.org>
Subject: Re: MURDER
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:53:17 -0600
P.S. Roe v. Wade was in the 70's this code was enacted September 1, 2003. Stats. 2003 78th Leg. Sess. Ch. 822 Sextion 2.07(a). and Roe v Wade Supreme Court was a ART II Court it is now an ART III Court. A NEW BALL GAME: That is why the penal code is written the way it is No governmental subdivision or agency may enact or enforce a law that makes any conduct covered by this code an offense subject to a criminal penalty; and THIS STATEMENT This chapter does not apply to the death of an unborn child if the conduct charged is: (1) conduct committed by the mother of the unborn child; IS UN-ENFORCEABLE by the STATE AGENTS.
"evans" <evans@basicisp.net>
To: "Joe Pojman" <joe@texasallianceforlife.org>
Subject: Re: MURDER
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:40:04 -0600
Sec. 1.08. Preemption.
Text
No governmental subdivision or agency may enact or enforce a law that makes any conduct covered by this code an offense subject to a criminal penalty. This section shall apply only as long as the law governing the conduct proscribed by this code is legally enforceable.
Dear Sir do you understand what this section means and who it applies too?
Do you under stand the difference between STATE OF TEXAS and The State of Texas and this State? Do you know the deference between a Resident of Texas and a domicile of Texas?
Do you know the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court under Roe v. Wade was involving a U.S. Resident of Texas and not a domicile of Texas?
Do you know the difference between legal and lawful? Abortion is legal in the U.S. but unlawful in Texas?
This chapter does not apply to the death of an unborn child if the conduct (WHAT CONDUCT ARE WE TALKING ABOUT HERE?) charged is: (1) conduct committed by the mother of the unborn child;
Are you claiming the first mother can murder a six month old unborn child and the second mother can't murder a child born six months old ? ``Individual'' means a human being who is alive, including an unborn child at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth.)
human being who is alive, including an unborn child
Are you claiming the people of Texas can murder their young and the courts are going to uphold and aid them?
----- Original Message -----
From: Joe Pojman
To: evans
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 4:49 PM
Subject: Re: MURDER
Dear Sir,
Thank you for your email. The reference in the Texas Penal Code you forwarded to me does not apply to legal abortion. You need to be aware of a related provision in the Penal Code:
Section 19.06. APPLICABILITY TO CERTAIN CONDUCT. This chapter does not apply to the death of an unborn child if the conduct charged is:
(1) conduct committed by the mother of the unborn child;
(2) a lawful medical procedure performed by a physician or other licensed health care provider with the requisite consent, if the death of the unborn child was the intended result of the procedure;
(3) a lawful medical procedure performed by a physician or other licensed health care provider with the requisite consent as part of an assisted reproduction as defined by Section 160.102, Family Code; or
(4) the dispensation of a drug in accordance with law or administration of a drug prescribed in accordance with law.
Added by Acts 2003, 78th Leg., ch. 822, Section 2.02, eff. Sept. 1, 2003.
If this provision were not in the Penal Code, the U.S. Supreme Court would certainly strike down the section you quoted above as unconstitutional under Roe v. Wade.
If you have any further questions, please contact us at info@texasallianceforlife.org.
Joe Pojman, Ph.D.
Executive Director
----- Original Message -----
From: evans
To: joe@texasallianceforlife.org
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 9:39 AM
Subject: MURDER
(Texas Penal Code Sec. 1.07. Definitions 26) ``Individual'' means a human being who is alive, including an unborn child at every stage of gestation from fertilization until birth.) Do you have any knowledge of any agency or any entity issuing any license for the creation of abortions clinics upon the land of Texas?
Do you have any knowledge of any abortion clinics doing business upon the land of Texas or in The State of Texas?
In view of the following taken from the Texas Penal Code:
2003 Note: The changes in law made by Ch. 822, Art. 2 apply only to an offense committed on or after the effective date of Ch. 822. For purposes of this section, an offense is committed before the effective date of Ch.822 if any element of the offense occurs before September 1, 2003. Stats. 2003 78th Leg. Sess. Ch. 822 Section § 2.07(a).
Sec. 1.08. Preemption.
Text
No governmental subdivision or agency may enact or enforce a law that makes any conduct covered by this code an offense subject to a criminal penalty. This section shall apply only as long as the law governing the conduct proscribed by this code is legally enforceable.
Do you know or have any knowledge of any agency or entity of any judicial, executive or legislative branch or any governmental subdivision using the Texas penal to prosecute in any court in The State of Texas or any COURT of this entity?
Do you know or have any knowledge of THE STATE OF TEXAS courts operating under the Clearfield doctrine, and if so explain?
Do you know or have any knowledge of THE STATE OF TEXAS, or any subdivision thereof being syndicated?
Do you know who or what this entity STATE OF TEXAS that is issuing license to murder the unborn? The SOS don't.
Ralph-Kenneth
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted August 28, 2005]
Notice of your Acceptance of Offer and Contract in law
Equality is paramount and mandated by law.
Notice and Demand for payment for the use of my recorded copyright. Recorder number 1039813 per the terms of the accepted contract and agreement for use of my copyright as recorded in the public records for the people of the county of Dallas, upon the land of Texas.
To copyright Users: Debbie Perez agent for and THE STATE OF TEXAS, JUSTICE COURT PRECINCT TWO, ROCKWALL COUNTY and Larry Holloway who I believe is the HIGH PRIEST for the unregistered, unincorporated religious association STATE OF TEXAS and ROCKWALL COUNTY.
968 T.L. TOWNSEND
Rockwall, Texas 75087
Regarding your acceptance of my contract for the use of my Copyright for your own self enrichment per Contract/agreement as recorded in the county of Dallas, Texas deed records number 1039813
Demand for payment for use of my private copyright the bill due and payable in funds pursuant Art 1. Sect. 10 Constitution for the United States America as follows
Bill Per Contract
User: Debbie Perez Chief Clerk debtor to me Ralph being one million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America for use of my copyright being total sum certain
of $1,000,000.00
User: THE STATE OF TEXAS debtor to me Ralph being one million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America for use of my copyright being total sum certain
of $1,000,000.00.
User: JUSTICE COURT PRECINCT TWO debtor to me Ralph being one million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America for use of my copyright being total sum certain
of $1,000,000.00
User: ROCKWALL COUNTY debtor to me Ralph being one million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America for use of my copyright being total sum certain
of $1,000,000.00 .
User: Larry Holloway debtor to me Ralph being one million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America for use of my copyright being total sum certain
of $1,000,000.00 .
Total amount due from users for use of copyright for self enrichment per Contract as agreed being five (5) million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America total sum certain of $5,000,000.00.
Pay the full amount five (5) million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America within twenty (20) days. Failure to pay within twenty (20) day will cause a penalty to be added to the total amount and a penalty for non-payment each thirty (30) days thereafter.
Send payment EXACT AND CERTAIN to:
Notary Public
3352 Broadway boulevard # 406
Garland, Texas [75043]
NOTICE TO THE AGENT IS NOTICE TO THE PRINCIPAL APPLIES TO THIS NOTICE OF BILL DUE AND OWING.
I reserve all my rights.
Mark: ______________________________________ Seal
Message center 972-475-9353
Certificate of Service
I certify that a copy of this two page bill is served by first class mail To copyright Users:
Debbie Perez agent for and THE STATE OF TEXAS, JUSTICE COURT PRECINCT TWO, ROCKWALL COUNTY and Larry Holloway whom Ralph believes be a HIGH PRIEST for the unregistered, unincorporated religious association STATE OF TEXAS and ROCKWALL _____________________________________ Seal
notary public
CC: STATE OF TEXAS Comptroller
Commissioners for ROCKWALL COUNTY A RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION
NOTICE August 25, 2005
To whom it may concern
The entity known as STATE OF TEXAS or TX is a religious unincorporated unregistered association.
It is headquartered in the middle Temple located in the city of London, England. It is operated in Texas by priest and high priest a.k.a. Esquire a title of English nobility, the middle Temple’s BAR licenses them all as attorneys. This association’s laws are from their farther Satan the laws of bondage and war the direct opposite of the laws of the God of heaven the creator who laws are of liberty and peace.
This Satanic (Cult) church demands separation of church and state in order for it to enforce it Satanic laws on it’s members. It issues numbers to members so that it is easy for it to recognize its members.
Where as, the Lord issues names to that which belongs to the Farther even to the animals.
When the Satanic association does issue a name to it’s members it is always in CAPITAL LETTERS denoting something other then a man or woman, in Texas it is a CORPORATE entity in the UNITED STATE’S Satanic religious association it is a vessel a.k.a. citizen, property of the UNITED STATE’S Satanic religious association.
The Priest and High Priest of this satanic religious Cult enforce the association’s law in their church Courts as attorneys (Priest) and judges (High Priest) claiming the right to discipline their members under church law outside the laws and the rules of law of the State of Texas.
The Cult members have set up their CHURCH government on the same order of the government of the State of Texas so no one will be the wiser. The officials of the cult are attempting to hold duel offices one in their religious cult and the same office in the government of the state of Texas. That is why they demand separation of church and state.
So be aware if you have signed contracts with a number and a capital letter name and with the entity known as STATE OF TEXAS or TX the religious unincorporated unregistered association you are a cult member and therefore fall under the jurisdiction of the law of the Temple of the city of London’s Priest (attorney), High Priest (Judges) and courts.
You have a political right to make a political choice you can stay a member or you can get out.
To: Secretary of State of Texas August 27, 2005
Dear Secretary
1. Your people from time to time request a legal opinion from the Attorney General. This Attorney General you request information of, is he the Attorney General of the State of Texas or is he the Attorney General of the STATE OF TEXAS or is he the Attorney General for both the State of Texas and the STATE OF TEXAS?
2. Do you have any knowledge of any Courts in The State of Texas that are not commercial corporate Courts that are judicators pursuant to the Texas Constitution and uphold the Texas Bill of Rights?
4. Do you have any knowledge that the people of Texas are being held as debtors for the Bankruptcy of the United States?
5. Do you refuse to answer the above questions 1-4 pursuant to the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution for the United States?
A non response to items 1-4 is a silent affirmative you are refusing to answer pursuant to the fifth amendment of the Constitution for the United States?
Your response can be by electronic mail to evans@basicisp.net or by mail exact and certain to; Notary Public, 3352 Broadway boulevard # 406, city of Garland, Texas state.
Ralph-Kenneth family of Evans
This Request is made pursuant to the information publish at http://www.sos.state.tx.us/records.shtml
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted September 1, 2005]
To: Robert Sumners <RSumners@sos.state.tx.us>
From: Evans
Reply to Reply: Request for name of Trustee
Thursday, September 01, 2005 10:01 PM
Mr Summers
Why have you sent me a web site of Commercial Statutes? I am not running process under Commercial Statues all my process is run under the law of the land of Texas Art 1 Section 19 Texas Constitution you will find it under the "Bill of Rights"
To: Robert Sumners <RSumners@sos.state.tx.us>
From: Evans
Reply to Reply: Request for name of Trustee
Thursday, September 01, 2005 9:57 PM
Robert Summers
I want to know who you are! Are you employed by the office of the Secretary of the State of Texas or are you employed by the SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS and do you claim the State of Texas and STATE OF TEXAS are the same entities?
Ralph family of Evans September 1, 2005
To: Robert Sumners <RSumners@sos.state.tx.us>
From: Evans
Reply to Reply: Request for name of Trustee
Thursday, September 01, 2005 9:23 PM
I told you not to confuse STATE OF TEXAS with the State of Texas; they are not the same entities. You are a twister; you must be an attorney operating out of the Satanic middle Temple located in the city of London. A Priest of the Temple who operates the entity STATE OF TEXAS. Sir I for one am tired of the deceit.
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Sumners
To: Evans
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 4:44 PM
Subject: RE: Request for name of Trustee
Dear Mr. Evans,
The Secretary of State is not the agent for service of process for a lawsuit wherein the plaintiff seeks to collect a debt from the State of Texas. For a list of statutes authorizing service on the Secretary of State, please see the following: http://www.sos.state.tx.us/statdoc/forms/2401.htm
Robert Sumners
Corporations Section
Office of the Secretary of State
-----Original Message-----
From: evans [mailto:evans@xxxxxp.net]
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 1:38 PM
To: Secretary of state of Texas
Subject: Request for name of Trustee
To: Secretary of State of Texas
Dear secretary are you the party that accepts service of process for suit to collect a debt for the entity known as STATE OF TEXAS? (see attached bill for debt owed) if you are not the party please disclose to me the proper party that is the trustee that does accept service for the entity known as STATE OF TEXAS not to be confused with the State of Texas.
Ralph family of Evans September 1, 2005
Secretary of state of Texas - secretary@sos.state.tx.us
To: Secretary of State of Texas
Thursday, September 01, 2005 1:38 PM
Dear secretary are you the party that accepts service of process for suit to collect a debt for the entity known as STATE OF TEXAS? (see attached bill for debt owed) if you are not the party please disclose to me the proper party that is the trustee that does accept service for the entity known as STATE OF TEXAS not to be confused with the State of Texas.
Ralph family of Evans September 1, 2005
Notice of your Acceptance of Offer and Contract in law
Equality is paramount and mandated by law.
Notice and Demand for payment for the use of my recorded copyright. Recorder number 1039813 per the terms of the accepted contract and agreement for use of my copyright as recorded in the public records for the people of the county of Dallas, upon the land of Texas.
To copyright Users: Debbie Perez agent for and THE STATE OF TEXAS, JUSTICE COURT PRECINCT TWO, ROCKWALL COUNTY and Larry Holloway who I believe is the HIGH PRIEST for the unregistered, unincorporated religious association STATE OF TEXAS and ROCKWALL COUNTY.
968 T.L. TOWNSEND
Rockwall, Texas 75087
Regarding your acceptance of my contract for the use of my Copyright for your own self enrichment per Contract/agreement as recorded in the county of Dallas, Texas deed records number 1039813
Demand for payment for use of my private copyright the bill due and payable in funds pursuant Art 1. Sect. 10 Constitution for the United States America as follows
Bill Per Contract
User: Debbie Perez Chief Clerk debtor to me Ralph being one million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America for use of my copyright being total sum certain of $1,000,000.00
User: THE STATE OF TEXAS debtor to me Ralph being one million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America for use of my copyright being total sum certain of $1,000,000.00.
User: JUSTICE COURT PRECINCT TWO debtor to me Ralph being one million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America for use of my copyright being total sum certain of $1,000,000.00
User: ROCKWALL COUNTY debtor to me Ralph being one million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America for use of my copyright being total sum certain of $1,000,000.00 .
User: Larry Holloway debtor to me Ralph being one million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America for use of my copyright being total sum certain of $1,000,000.00 .
Total amount due from users for use of copyright for self enrichment per Contract as agreed being five (5) million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America total sum certain of $5,000,000.00.
Pay the full amount five (5) million dollars silver specie coin of the United States of America within twenty (20) days. Failure to pay within twenty (20) day will cause a penalty to be added to the total amount and a penalty for non-payment each thirty (30) days thereafter.
Send payment EXACT AND CERTAIN to:
Notary Public
3352 Broadway boulevard # 406
Garland, Texas [75043]
NOTICE TO THE AGENT IS NOTICE TO THE PRINCIPAL APPLIES TO THIS NOTICE OF BILL DUE AND OWING.
I reserve all my rights.
Mark: ______________________________________ Seal
Message center 972-475-9353
Certificate of Service
I certify that a copy of this two page bill is served by first class mail To copyright Users:
Debbie Perez agent for and THE STATE OF TEXAS, JUSTICE COURT PRECINCT TWO, ROCKWALL COUNTY and Larry Holloway whom Ralph believes be a HIGH PRIEST for the unregistered, unincorporated religious association STATE OF TEXAS and ROCKWALL COUNTY.
968 T.L. TOWNSEND Rockwall, Texas this date August 24, 2005.
___________________________________ Seal
notary public
CC: STATE OF TEXAS Comptroller
Commissioners for ROCKWALL COUNTY A RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted September 20, 2005]
From; Ralph-Kenneth: Evans September 19, 2005
Mailing location Exact certain: Notary Public 3352 Broadway Boulevard # 407 city of Garland, Texas.
To: Debbie Perez and THE STATE OF TEXAS, JUSTICE COURT PRECINCT TWO, ROCKWALL COUNTY and Larry Holloway whom I believe is the High Priest for the unregistered, unincorporated religious association known as STATE OF TEXAS and ROCKWALL COUNTY. (herein after Respondents)
Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit for non-payment of Bill Past due and owing by Respondents.
This Declaration is made by me, as pursuant to Federal rule 1746 (1) of Title 28 USCA
In the matters of commerce, all commerce operates in truth. Demand for truth is made of all parties for full disclosure.
The State of Texas )
The county of Dallas )
In the Matter of the use of my private property:
I, me, addressee Ralph-Kenneth, family of Evans , the undersigned, one of the Sovereign people, natural born living soul, the Posterity, born upon the land in the one of several counties within the one of the several States united of America, with out contract with this state or THE STATE OF TEXAS. I the undersigned Posterity, Creditor, and Secured Party, hereinafter "creditor"," do hereby solemnly declare, say, and state:
1. I, me, the Creditor is competent to declare and state the matters set forth herewith and I am over the age of sixty-five years.
2. I, me, the Creditor has personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
3. All the facts stated herein are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence and if testifying I, me, the Creditor shall so state.
Plain Statement of Facts
A matter must be expressed to be resolved. In commerce truth is sovereign. Truth is expressed in the form of an Affidavit. An unrebutted Affidavit stands as Truth in commerce. An unrebutted Affidavit becomes the judgment in commerce. An Affidavit for Truth, under commercial law, can only be satisfied: by a rebuttal Affidavit for truth, by payment, by agreement, by resolution, by a jury according to the rules of Common Law.
I, me, Creditor am expressing truth by this Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit for non-payment of Bill due and owing by Respondents
WHEREAS, the public record is the highest form of evidence, I, me, Creditor, am hereby timely creating public record by Declaration with this Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit for Truth in Commerce and for Bill due and owing by Respondents for use of my private property.
1. Fact: On or about the 22nd day of August of 2005 Respondent sent a Document to the Notary Public mailing location and received by the Notary address to me Ralph, Evans using my Copyright claiming an amount of up to $500.00 for them self and their religious associations from my estate.
2. Fact: On or about the 24th day of August of 2005 I presented to Respondent by first class mail a bill for the sum certain five million dollars in silver specie pursuant to the recorded contract/agreement for use of my RES RALPH EVANS as evident by the agreement as follows:
4. Fact: Use of the Fiction on any document associated in any manner with my Estate or me, the holder in due course, Secured Party, without my written prior consent is strictly forbidden and chargeable to each user and issuer in the amount of the sum certain of one thousand (1000.00) dollars of silver specie in lawful coinage of the United States per user and per issuer per Fiction.
5. Fact: Use of the Fiction for the intent of gains for themselves (the issuers or users) or for others of any of my Rights, my private property or any part of my Estate without full disclosure and my written prior consent is strictly forbidden and chargeable to each of the users and issuers in the amount of the sum certain of one million (1,000,000.00) dollars of silver specie in lawful coinage of the United States as defined under Article I, Section 10 of We the People's Contract/Constitution for the United States per use per Fiction including any past, present or future use.
6. Fact: Use of the Fiction on any document associated in any manner with my Estate or me, the holder in due course, Secured Party, without my written prior consent is all of the evidence required for enforcement of this agreement/contract and evidence that any and all users and issuers are in full agreement and have accepted this agreement/contract under the condition and terms so stated and set forth herein and is due and payable under the terms and conditions set forth herein this agreement/contract.
3. Fact: The Respondent was given grace of twenty days to pay the bill and notice that if he failed to pay the bill with in twenty days a penalty would be accessed and a penalty would be assessed each thirty days there after and added to the unpaid balance until paid in full.
4. Fact: The Respondent has failed to pay the debt or make any reply. Notice to debtors, the Respondents if the amount of 5,000,000.00 dollars in silver specie is paid within ten (10) days from receipt of this declaration of non-payment all penalties will be waived.
5. Fact: The Respondent has ten (10) days to pay the attached bill in the amount of the sum certain five million Dollars in silver specie failure to pay will cause a ten percent (10%) penalty to be added to the total bill and ten percent each thirty days here after till the bill is paid in full. See bill attached.
6. Fact: If Respondent fails to settle the account and pay the bill plus penalty due me within ten (10) days failure will cause judgment to be recorded against Respondent.. The Respondent is responsible for all time, cost and fees.
7. Fact: THE STATE OF TEXAS is not the State of Texas and ROCKWALL COUNTY is not the county of Rockwall and I am not a member of the association known as THE STATE OF TEXAS and ROCKWALL COUNTY.
Notice to the agent is notice to the principal applies to this Verified Declaration in the Nature of an Affidavit for non-payment of Bill due and owing by Respondent in support of judgment and abstract.
With full reservation of all my natural God given substantive rights without prejudice under the State Constitution. Executed pursuant to TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE Section 602.004 and federal rules title 28 USCA 1746 (1) this
19th day of the month of September in the year A.D. two-thousand-five
Private Mark: ______________________
The use of a notary on this document does not constitute any adhesion, nor does it alter my status in any manner. The purpose of notary is for verification and identification only.
The State of Texas )
county of Dallas )
Ralph-Kenneth: Evans appeared before me a Notary Public in and for the State of Texas, acknowledged and executed this declaration by his mark of his on free will this ______ day of the month of September in the year A.D. two-thousand-five.
Notary Public in and for the State of Texas
Name: ________________________________________________ Seal:
Service by certified mail # 7099 3220 0004 3971 5083 this date September 19, 2005.
CC: ROCKWALL COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Comptroller for THE STATE OF TEXAS
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted October 7, 2005]
Subject: Roe v. Wade violated the Human rights treaty
From: evans
To: secretary@sos.state.tx.us
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 12:17 PM
NOTICE
TO: GOVERNOR Rick Parry by notice to the office of the Secretary of State of Texas pursuant to T.R. C.P. 2. I already sent you a copy of the Texas law in this matter here is the Treaty law.
[Added Note: It was sent under the title of Murder dated Aug 15, 2005]
The baby that is aborted in Texas is arbitrarily deprived of his life in violation of this treaty and Texas law. I believe that is called murder. The supreme Courts ruling in Roe vs. Wade arbitrarily violated this treaty and Texas law. Who issues license to these clinics that are being aborted in violation of this treaty and the Laws of Texas.
Answer: It is the religious cult known as THE STATE OF TEXAS run out of the middle Temple in the city of London by its bar card attorneys (the Priest and the alleged Texas judges who are the High Priest) in collusion with all three branches of the Texas government...
AMERICAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
(Signed at the Inter-American Specialized Conference on Human Rights, San Jose, Costa Rica, 22 November 1969)
CHAPTER II: CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS
Article 3. Right to Juridical Personality
Every person has the right to recognition as a person before the law.
Article 4. Right to Life
1. Every person has the right to have his life respected. This right shall be protected by law and, in general, from the moment of conception. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life.
[Behind the Scenes with Ken Posted October 7, 2005]
Subject: NOTICE OF TREATY VIOLATIONS
To: <secretary@sos.state.tx.us>
From: "evans" <evans38@xxxxnet>
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 11:18:01 -0500
TO:
GOVERNOR Rick Parry by notice to the office of the Secretary of State of Texas pursuant to T.R.C.P. 2
The Executive Department, the Legislative Department and the judicial department are all operating in violation of International Treaties as well as the laws of Texas and its Constitution. The county court of record in and for the county of Dallas is closed. Closure of said court violates my human rights by denying me due process by law. The de-facto this State THE STATE OF TEXAS it is ILLEGITIMATE BUT IN EFFECT A DE FACTO GOVERNMENT run by BAR CARD ATTORNEY who are using their bar cards to rob and steal. The bar card attorneys before the bar and on the bench have rob me of my liberty, my land my funds in "cash" and protected those that have damaged my property.
I want the county Court of record for and in the county of Dallas open immediately so I can sue the bar card criminals and those that are corruptly using STATE OF TEXAS COURTS TO protect them.
The Court being close denies me a law remedy and due process. It denies basic human rights.
Ralph-kenneth: Evans domicile and land owner within the county of Dallas, Texas
Attach you will fine copies from Black's 8TH Edition defining terms and a copy of the humans right treaty.
